Showing posts with label 1796. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1796. Show all posts

Sunday, July 19, 2026

ARP394 Tennessee Joins the Union

On June 1, 1796, President Washington signed the law formally admitting Tennessee as the 16th state to join the union.  This week, we’ll take a look at how Tennessee got there.

We last looked at this region back in Episode 335.  At that time, the western counties of North Carolina were sick of the abuse they were getting from the rest of the state, and declared themselves to be the independent State of Franklin.

North Carolina had already agreed to cede this land to the Continental Congress in 1784, but Congress refused to accept it.  The residents then felt free to form their own state and applied to Congress for recognition.

Collapse of Franklin

Between 1784 and 1788, the state of Franklin operated independently of North Carolina.  It elected Revolutionary War hero John Sevier as its president.  The government continued to work with the Confederation Congress to gain recognition, and made treaties with Indian tribes to justify its land claims.

Map of Tennessee, 1796
North Carolina officials declared the Franklin movement to be a revolt and an act of treason against the state.  At the same time, North Carolina did not have the money or power to suppress the rebellion militarily, so it focused on political compromise.  If offered pardons to any citizens of Franklin who returned their allegiance to North Carolina.  It also authorized continued elections in those western counties, permitting loyalists to elect representatives to the North Carolina legislature.

North Carolina sought to divide Franklin by establishing local leaders that supported the view that they should remain part of North Carolina.  Very quickly John Tipton assumed that leadership role.  

Tipton had originally been a part of the movement to form the independent State of Franklin.  He was also a political rival of Sevier.  When the Franklin legislature unanimously elected Sevier as president, and Tipton could not even get a seat in the legislature, he took great offense.  He was further disenchanted when the state constitution he supported, which favored strict religious requirements and morality laws, was rejected in favor of a constitution that was simply a modified version of the North Carolina Constitution.  Tipton saw his dream for the new state, and his role in the leadership, disappear.

In the loyalist election run by the North Carolina government in August of 1786, Tipton won election as a representative from the disputed western counties to the North Carolina legislature.  Tipton became a leading advocate for crushing the State of Franklin and keeping the western counties within the state of North Carolina.

For the next two years, the people living in this disputed territory were subject to two different governments that conflicted with one another.  There were two sets of militia, two court systems, and two separate demands for the payment of taxes.  The situation became so dire that in 1787, Sevier and North Carolina General Evan Shelby had to reach a temporary understanding that residents would not be forced to pay taxes to one jurisdiction if they had already paid taxes to the other. 

This agreement was only a temporary one to prevent an all out civil war between the two groups.  At the same time, North Carolina Governor Richard Caswell, who had been friends with Sevier, promised that if the Franklin movement ended its efforts at independence, North Carolina would allow a peaceful separation under its own terms at a later date.  North Carolina also encouraged Franklin supporters to jump ship by promising to forgive the years of back taxes due to North Carolina, if they would abandon the movement.

These conciliatory efforts, along with North Carolina’s ability to isolate Franklin economically, the movement lost support. Franklin’s government began to collapse in late 1787 officials feared holding an election because it would almost certainly result in a contest of arms that would leave many dead..  When President Sevier’s term ended in March of 1788, there was no legislature in place to replace him and no infrastructure to hold a new election.  With that, the Franklin government collapsed completely and the state largely faded away.

Sevier Resists

Sevier, however, and other smaller numbers of men refused to give up.  In February 1788, just before Sevier’s term ended and while Sevier was away trying to make agreements with local Indian tribes, Tipton had the North Carolina sheriff raid Sevier’s plantation and seize his slaves for nonpayment of North Carolina taxes.

When Sevier returned he discovered that his slaves were at Tipton’s plantation.  He rounded up 150 men to take back his property by force.  His men surrounded the plantation, but Tipton refused to concede.  Sevier men outnumbered the 15 defenders by 10 to 1.  They even brought up a small field cannon to force a surrender.  Tipton, however, refused to back down.  He dared the attackers to fire.  Sevier could not follow through on his threat.  He was not ready to massacre Tipton and kick off a larger war, which he would almost certainly lose.

Sevier’s men besieged the plantation for a few days.  They did take pot shots at a few defenders who stepped outside the house, killing one and wounding another.  Finally a relief force arrived, scattering Sevier’s army and capturing their cannon.

Two of Sevier’s sons were captured following the retreat.  Tipton threatened to hang both of them but backed down after they pleaded for mercy. Despite this incident, things seemed to be returning to unity with North Carolina largely back in control.

Governor Caswell’s policy of persuasion had had an impact, but North Carolina replaced him with Governor Samuel Johnston.  According to most sources, Johnston was not particularly interested in the frontier issues.  As a colonial legislator, he had sponsored legislation to punish western colonists who had rebelled at Alamance.  Those advising him, including Tipton, advised the governor that Sevier remained a threat to North Carolina.  

Sevier had reached an understanding with North Carolina Militia commander Evan Shelby, but Shelby had been replaced by Joseph Martin, who very much wanted to use force to crush the Franklin movement.  Martin convinced Governor Johnston that this was the right policy.  He suggested that Sevier was incorrigible and would never settle.  He asserted that Sevier had killed a Cherokee chief and was on the brink of inviting a larger Cherokee war against the region, and that he might be raising a western army to attack North Carolina directly.

None of these accusations seemed to have much basis in fact, but it was enough for Governor Johnston to order Sevier’s arrest for high treason.  Johnston issued the order in July, 1788.  Sevier, at the time, was leading an army but one that was fighting off attacks from Cherokee and Chickamauga warriors on the frontier.

Arrest and Redemption

When Sevier returned home in the fall, Tipton formed a posse, cornered Sevier at the home of a friend and arrested him.  He placed Sevier in handcuffs and brought him to Morgantown.  Along the way, one of the guards informed Sevier that one of the guards planned to murder him.  Sevier tried to make an escape but his horse got tangled in the underbrush.  The guard that was determined to kill Sevier, a man named French, caught up with Sevier, pulled his pistol and shot Sevier in the head.  Fortunately, the ball had fallen out of the pistol before it was fired, leaving Sevier with only a powder burn.

The posse delivered Sevier to the Sheriff of Burke County.  Sevier, however, still had a loyal following.  Word of his arrest soon resulted in 2000 men picking up their arms and riding to rescue Sevier. 

The army assembled at Jonesboro. Those commanding the volunteer force, including Sevier’s sons, met to debate how to proceed best.  One of the officers, Major James Cozby suggested that the best way to rescue Sevier was not with a large army but rather a small group of men who could conduct a jailbreak.  Cozby hand picked five other men, all of whom were officers who had served under Sevier during the Revolution War and in the Indian wars.

By the time the men arrived in Morgantown, the treason trial against Sevier had already begun.  Thousands of people surrounded the court house as spectators.  Cozby left four of the men and their horses on the outskirts of the crowd.  He and Captain Nathaniel Evans rode into the crowd and made their way up to the courthouse door, bringing Sevier’s horse with them.  Cozby walked the courtroom, made eye contact with Sevier and made sure Sevier saw his horse standing by the courthouse door.

Cozby then shouted at the judge, creating a distraction.  Sevier took that moment to dash for the door, jump on his horse and ride off at a full gallop.  During the confusion, Cozby and Evans also managed to get back to their horses and ride away.  Although the sheriff’s deputies gave chase, they were unable to catch anyone.

Part of this success may have been do to with the fact that most of the anti-Sevier advocates, including Tipton and Martin, had already gone into hiding.   Sevier’s capture had brought on threats by mobs to lynch these men.  Therefore, people who probably could have identified Sevier’s friends and who had an inclination to do so, were not at the trial.

Despite his escape, Sevier was a wanted fugitive from the law.  But his popularity remained so high among the people in the western counties that it soon became apparent that officials needed to come to some accommodation with him.  

While on the run from the law, the voters elected Sevier to the North Carolina State Senate.  In November, 1789, Sevier showed up at the capital, demanding to take his seat.  Other representatives, including Tipton, objected to seating a wanted fugitive.  Sevier was so popular though, that debate turned to a resolution to withdraw the charges against him and restore his rights of citizenship.  Debate on the matter grew so intense that Tipton attempted to strangle one of Sevier’s advocates on the House floor.  Others broke up the fight, but soon a duel was planned for the two men, but the matter was settled before the actual duel occurred.

The resolution passed and Sevier took his seat.  That was not the end of his redemption.  Shortly afterward, Militia General Martin submitted a claim for a militia campaign against the Chickamauga.  By tradition, the western militia had defended themselves against the Indians and had borne their own costs.  The legislature was so offended by the claim for expenses, that they removed Martin as brigadier general of the western militia.  In his place, they appointed, guess who: John Sevier!  So in a matter of days, Sevier went from being a criminal target of the militia, to being their new commander.

The following year, Sevier left the state legislature.  North Carolina had finally ratified the US  Constitution.  The voters of western North Carolina elected Sevier to the US House of Representatives and sent him to Congress.

Southwest Territory

While in Congress, Sevier helped to arrange North Carolina’s second attempt to cede western lands to the Federal Government.  This time it was more successful.  Congress accepted the land cession and established the Southwest Territory in the spring of 1790.  President Washington appointed William Blount as governor of the Southwest Territory.  

I mentioned Blount before as one of the speculators who got caught up in the effort to buy the Yazoo lands of western Georgia.  Blount had also been active in the movement to get North Carolina to ratify the Constitution.  After Blount lost a bid to become one of North Carolina’s first US Senators, President Washington offered him the governorship of the Southwest Territory, which is essentially what became Tennessee.  This was in thanks for his efforts in bringing North Carolina into the Union.

Western settlers were initially skeptical of Blount, who was from eastern North Carolina.  But Blount made friends with Sevier, who still held the trust of the westerners.  Blount also tried to appoint Tipton as a Justice of the Peace, but Tipton refused the appointment.  Blount made efforts to end the feud between Sevier and Tipton.  He made some progress, at one point convincing Tipton to burn a petition that he had been circulating to discredit Sevier.  But the two men never really got past their differences.

Much of Blount’s efforts however, were focused on peace with the Indians.  In 1791, he managed to get agreement to the Treaty of Holston with the Cherokee, establishing which lands were reserved for Indians and which were open for settlement.

The area that became the southwest territory already had seven counties, Washington, Sullivan, Greene, Davidson, Sumner, Hawkins, and Tennessee counties.  As territorial governor Blount created two more counties in 1792, Knox county, named for his superior, Secretary of War Henry Knox, and Jefferson County.  Both of these were set on lands acquired through the Treaty of Holston.

In October, Blount established the territorial capital of the territory at a fort along the Tennessee River in Knox county. The town became known as Knoxville.

Territorial Legislature

Under the rules set by Congress for the territory, it would at first be controlled by the governor, a secretary and three federal judges all appointed by the president.  Once the population reached 5000 qualified voters, they would establish a territorial legislature.  To vote, one had to be a free white male at least 21 years old and with at least 50 acres of land.

A 1791 census showed over 6000 qualified voters, but Governor Blount delayed establishing a legislature for over two years.  Blount wanted to consolidate his own power in the territory, and perhaps put himself in a better position to enrich himself with western land grants.  He argued that the delay was over the lack of taxes to support a legislature, but this led to pushback from the people.

The territory finally held its first elections in late 1793, leading to the legislature being seated in February of 1794.  Under the territorial rules, the people elected a house of representatives.  The house then nominated ten men to form a legislative council, essentially an upper house.  President Washington would select five of those ten men to serve in that upper house.  Among those selected for the legislative council was John Sevier.  The legislature also elected a territorial non-voting delegate to represent the territory in the US Congress.

The legislature got to work, quickly forming Sevier County in 1794 and Blount County in 1795.  They also chartered three colleges, Blount College, which eventually became the University of Tennessee, Greeneville College, and Washington College.  They set up a territorial tax code, setting the maximum land tax at 12.5 cents per 100 acres. They also authorized public lotteries for special government projects.

For statehood, the Northwest Ordinance a territory needed 60,000 free inhabitants before applying for statehood.  People assumed the same rule would apply to the Southwest Territory. In 1795, the legislature called on Governor Blount to conduct a census  The results of the census revealed in November a free population of over 66,000 plus another 10,000 slaves.

Constitutional Convention

The legislature promptly called for a Constitutional Convention to meet in Knoxville in January of 1796.  Each of the eleven counties sent five delegates for a total of 55 delegates at the convention.  They chose Blount to serve as the Convention Chairman.  Interestingly, Sevier did not serve as a delegate to the convention.

The main purpose of the convention was to write a constitution. There was some debate about whether to have a single house legislature or a bicameral legislature with two houses.  They chose the latter.  There was also considerable debate over religious tests for office.  The original proposal required all office holders to believe in the “divine authority of the old and new testaments.” This was removed and replaced with a prohibition on anyone holding office who denied the existence of God.  They also excluded ministers from serving in the state legislature.

Another important provision mandated that all land be taxed at the same rate, based on acreage, not value.  This was a boon to land speculators who held particularly valuable parcels of land.  Another issue came up because of a significant portion of the population who operated farms on Indian lands.  Since they could not officially own this land, they could not serve since they were not land owners.  The delegates added a special exception to allow these people to serve in office.  

Voting, however, removed all land ownership requirements.  Any free adult male who resided in the state for at least six months was free to vote.  Voting was open to both black and white men, as long as they were free.

One of the more controversial debates was over what might happen if the Federal government refused their application for admission into the Union  Remember the whole State of Franklin controversy happened when North Carolina had tried to cede this territory before, Congress rejected taking it, and the population formed the State of Franklin.

One delegate proposed that they make clear that they would exist as an independent state, whether or not the Federal government allowed them to join the Union.  This revived fears of a whole new State of Franklin part 2 controversy where the people would once again be fighting the rest of the country for their own independence.  

The response to this was that the Federal government had already taken control of the territory.  It gave every indication that it was ready to include them in the union, and there was no need to provoke controversy unless some rejection actually happened.  The majority of delegates voted to table the question and move on to other things.  However, the preamble of the Constitution they drafted did make clear that the people “do mutually agree with each other to form themselves into a free and independent state.”

One other decision that the Convention had to decide was what to call the new state.  They avoided calling it Franklin, mostly out of concern that it would dredge up again those divisions that had plagued the region for the last decade.  A young lawyer at the convention, Andrew Jackson, suggested they call the state Tennessee, named after the Tennessee River, which, in turn took its name from the Cherokee Town of Tenase.

The main problem with that name was that there was already a Tennessee County.  That county agreed to change its name and give the name to the new State.

Statehood

When the convention ended on February 6, 1796, the process moved pretty quickly.  Blount forwarded the state constitution to Secretary of State Timothy Pickering.  Without waiting for any response, the Tennessee General Assembly convened its first secession at the end of March.

President Washington forwarded the constitution and application for statehood to Congress on April 8.  Congress, of course, had its concerns.  The main concern was political.  Federalists were concerned that Tennessee would vote for Thomas Jefferson in the upcoming presidential elections later that year, potentially harming Adams’ chances of winning.  Some of them argued that the census was “rigged” and that Tennessee really didn’t have a free population of 60,000 people.  Some argued the territory should be divided into two states, which would have greatly delayed the process since each of those state would have to develop a population of 60,000.

After about a month of debate, the house passed a bill approving admission by a vote of 43 to 30.  The matter then went to the Senate, which promptly voted against admission.  The two houses then worked out a deal which granted admission, but also reduced Tennessee’s initial house delegation, from two to one person until the 1800 census.  This also had the effect of giving the state one less electoral vote for the next two presidential elections.

With this change, the Senate withdrew its objections to statehood and the bill passed on May 31.  The next day, June 1, President Washington signed the admission bill, formally admitted Tennessee into the Union as the 16th state.

Next Week: George Washington gives his farewell address.

 - - -

Next Episode 395 Washington's Farewell Address (coming soon)

Previous Episode 393 Yazoo Land Scandal

 Contact me via email at mtroy.history@gmail.com

 Follow the podcast on X (formerly Twitter) @AmRevPodcast

 Join the Facebook group, American Revolution Podcast 

 Join American Revolution Podcast on Quora 
 
Discuss the AmRev Podcast on Reddit

American Revolution Podcast Merch!

T-shirts, hoodies, mugs, pillows, totes, notebooks, wall art, and more.  Get your favorite American Revolution logo today.  Help support this podcast.  https://merch.amrevpodcast.com


American Revolution Podcast is distributed 100% free of charge. If you can chip in to help defray my costs, I'd appreciate whatever you can give.  Make a one time donation through my PayPal account. You may also donate via Venmo (@Michael-Troy-20).


Click here to see my Patreon Page
You can support the American Revolution Podcast as a Patreon subscriber.  This is an option making monthly pledges.  Patreon support will give you access to ad-free episodes, podcast extras, and help make the podcast a sustainable project.



Signup for the AmRev Podcast Mail List

* indicates required

Further Reading

Websites

Free eBooks
(from archive.org unless noted)

Arthur, John Preston Western North Carolina: A History (from 1730 to 1913), Raleigh, NC: Edward Buncombe Chapter of the DAR, 1914.  

Garrett, William R. History of Tennessee: Its People and its Institutions, Nashville: The Brandon Co. 1900. 

Gilmore, James R. John Sevier as a Commonwealth-Builder, New York: D. Appleton and Co. 1898. 

Karns, T.C. Tennessee History Stories, Richmond: B.F. Johnson Printing Co. 1904. 

Phelan, James History of Tennessee: The Making of a State, Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and co. 1888. 

Turner, Francis Marion Life of General John Sevier, New York: The Neale Publishing Co. 1910. 

Books Worth Buying
(links to Amazon.com unless otherwise noted)*

Corlew, Robert, et. al Tennessee: A Short History, Univ. of Tennessee Press, 1969.

Durham, Walter T. Before Tennessee: The Southwest Territory, 1790-1796, Rocky Mount Historical Assn. 1990. 

Finger, John R. Tennessee Frontiers: Three Regions in Transition, Indiana Univ. Press, 2001

Foster, Dave Tennessee: Territory to Statehood, Top Tenn. Press, 2000 (borrow on archive.org

Langsdon, Phillip R. Tennessee: A Political History, Hillsboro Press, 2000.

 * As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Sunday, July 5, 2026

ARP392 Treaty with Spain

On October 7, 1795, the Ambassador Thomas Pinckney agreed to the first treaty between the US and Spain.  During the Revolutionary War, Spain had used the American rebellion against Britain to attack British colonies and territories.  Spain, however, was not interested in independence.  Spain controlled a vast system of colonies that controlled the western portion of North America and all of central and South America other than Brazil and a few other small colonies.  It also controlled the largest and wealthiest colonies in the Caribbean. 

King Carlos was in no hurry to join the spirit of revolution and liberty that had infected France and eventually led to the overthrow of King Louis. He was also in no hurry to encourage the colonies under Spanish control to think that fighting for independence was a good idea.

Spanish Louisiana

When Spain first received the Louisiana Territory from France at the end of the Seven Years War, it really wasn’t sure what to do with it.  Most of the territory was inhabited by Indian tribes, with very few colonists from any European power.  Almost all the colonists that were there were French.  Spain mostly ignored the colony, leaving many French officials in power for years, even after it took ownership.  

Thomas Pinckney
New Orleans was the one town of any significant size in the territory.  When the first Spanish commander, Alejandro O’Reilly came in 1769, a census revealed a population of about 3200.  About 40% of those were African slaves.  The remainder were primarily French speaking colonists.  The New Orleans population was about one-third of the entire non-Indian population in all of Louisiana.

O’Reilly had come to crush a rebellion against Spanish rule.  Spain, however, was not interested in displacing the French-speaking colonists.  It had no one who really wanted to settle there.  Instead, the French population and the Spanish government reached an accommodation, much like the French colonists in Quebec did with their new British leaders.

After Spain joined the war with Britain in 1779, Louisiana became vulnerable to attack, and also useful as a staging area for Spanish offensives into British territory along the Gulf Coast.  Bernardo de Gálvez took command there and pushed Spanish control as far east as Pensacola. Gálvez also encouraged more Spanish immigrants to move to Louisiana, pushing many people from the Canary Islands to move there.

When the Revolution ended, Spain found its interests in direct conflict with those of the United States.  Spain retook control of East and West Florida, which it had held until the end the Seven Years War, then received back when Britain ceded it at the end of the Revolutionary War.  This resulted in Spanish borders pushing up against US borders in Georgia.  

America’s peace treaty with Britain also gave the US control of all lands east of the Mississippi River, meaning that the US bordered directly against Spanish Louisiana along a more than 2000 mile border. 

Colonization and Trade

Spain’s concern was that the US was growing in power and in size, and aggressively expanding its population westward into new territories.  It was only a matter of time before US growth would threaten control of Spanish territories.

Spain needed a larger population to counter this American pressure.  After the Revolution, officials encouraged a new wave of immigrants.  In 1785 it was the Acadians.

Recall that the Acadians were French colonists who had lived in what is today called Nova Scotia in Canada.  When Britain took control of that region at the beginning of the Seven Years War, it expelled the Acadians.  Some of them moved to Louisiana at that time.  A great many others moved to French Guyana or the Falkland Islands.  Some moved back to France, settling in Poitou.  These refugees were generally unhappy, so when Louisiana welcomed them, more than 1500 Acadians moved there.

Moving French colonists into this former French colony may have created concerns that France might someday reclaim the colony.  But at the time. Spanish officials were more concerned about the American threat.  Having fellow Catholics as colonists was better than uncontrolled land that might get snatched up by American frontiersmen.

By this time Galvez had moved on to other commands, becoming governor of Cuba for a time and then to serve as Viceroy of New Spain, what is today Mexico and most of the American Southwest.  Esteban Miró took over in Louisiana, but he asked to return to Spain in 1791.  He was succeeded by the Baron de Carondelet.

Governor Carondelet continued the efforts to attract more colonists.  In the era of the French Revolution, Carondelet invited French royalists to find refuge in Louisiana.  These invitations came with generous land grants, and even paid for transportation costs and basic supplies to help them get started.  One agreement granted every family 400 acres plus a cash bonus of one hundred pesos.  Invitations went out to all Europeans, particularly Catholics.  Flemish, German, and Italian immigrants took up these offers.

Spain wanted to keep the Americans away.  This is why they kept the Mississippi River closed to American commercial traffic.  American frontier communities had no other feasible way to get their products to market.  By shutting down the option of the Mississippi River, Spanish authorities hoped to discourage western expansion in America and therefore slow down the eventual border disputes that would inevitably arise.

New Orleans continued to grow at a rapid rate.  In 1788, however, a fire swept through New Orleans destroying virtually every building in the town.  The fire also destroyed all of the food, meaning the population was homeless and starving.  Governor Miro, dropped his orders to block American commerce.  He sent out word that trade was welcome from American shipping, both from the east coast and down the Mississippi.  He pardoned those currently in prison for illegally bringing American products to town, and sent them off trying to request that they bring more.

By 1794, the city had recovered, when another fire struck.  This one took out only around 15%-20% of the city since many of the buildings had been rebuilt with brick or stone instead of wood.  Still, the fire’s devastation created more need for American trade.

Governor Carondelet also installed the city’s first street lighting, added night watchmen for security, and divided the city into four wards that were used to organize police and fire departments.

New Orleans came to accept that it needed more trade to survive and thrive.  Even after opening free trade to all French colonies, New Orleans was still suffering.  As much as officials wanted to discourage American growth by blocking trade with them, they eventually determined that they could not survive without it.

Officials mostly tried to control this with tariffs for any vessels using the Mississippi River.  Spain controlled both banks of the Mississippi below the Ohio River and imposed a fee on any boats or rafts carrying cargo.  These fees could be up to 25% of the cargo’s value. Attempts to evade these tariffs could result in fines, jail, and confiscation of all cargo.

I should also mention that King Charles III of Spain died in 1788, leading to the reign of his son, Charles IV.  The younger Charles was not as active in leading Spain as was his father, and did not demand such a confrontational policy against America.  However, he mostly left his policies up to his ministers, particularly relying on Foreign Minister Manuel de Godoy for matters involving America.

James Wilkinson

Spain liked having the benefits of trade with frontier settlements along the Mississippi.  What they did not like was the fact that these settlements represented US expansion and a long term threat to Spanish control of Louisiana.  To break this threat while keeping the trade benefits, Spain embarked on a plan to break off the western states from the eastern states so that these western areas would become dependent on Spain. 

The key to their plan was an American, James Wilkinson.  I’ve talked about Wilkinson’s history in past episodes.  He was an up and coming Continental officer in the Revolutionary War.  By 1777, he was a 20 year old colonel, breveted as a brigadier general.  But his role as an aide to Horatio Gates came to an end when his gossip revealed the Conway Cabal.  Later, Congress appointed him clothier general, but his poor performance forced his resignation from that role in 1781.

Wilkinson briefly served as a general in the Pennsylvania militia, but then moved to Kentucky after the war.  He played an active role in separating Kentucky from Virginia, and also was a leading voice against ratifying the US Constitution.

Before the Constitutional Convention completed its work, and the Confederation Congress was falling apart, America’s future looked bleak.  Over 1785 and 1786, John Jay as the Confederation’s secretary for foreign affairs, tentatively agreed to a treaty with Spain that would have prevented American use of the Mississippi River for 25 years.  

Spain was demanding this concession for the same reason that the US frontier hated it.  Blocking use of the river would kill western settlements.  Jay seemed willing to sell out western interests in exchange for benefits that would help eastern merchants.  Ultimately, the US refused to ratify any treaty at that time, but the ill feelings of westerners remained raw.

It was in this environment that Wilkinson travelled to New Orleans in 1787 to meet with Governor Miró.  He offered his services as a Spanish agent, and took a secret oath of allegiance to the King of Spain.  Wilkinson encouraged Spain to deny American frontier towns access to the Mississippi River, believing that this would eventually force Kentucky to abandon the US and join with Spain.  

He arranged for special exceptions for himself and some of his friends to use the Mississippi, essentially giving himself a trade monopoly on the river that would enrich him.  On top of that, he received pay from Spain and negotiated for lifetime pensions for himself and others who would help bring Kentucky under Spanish influence.  Spain authorized a $200,000 bribe fund to encourage the leaders of Kentucky to separate from the Union and form an alliance with Spain.

In addition to enriching himself, Wilkinson envisioned himself as the leader of a new buffer country between the US and Louisiana, controlling what is today the states of Kentucky, Tennessee, Alabama, and Mississippi.

After Kentucky ratified the Constitution, Spain largely gave up on the idea that this would happen anytime soon, but still kept Wilkinson on the Spanish payroll as Agent 13.  Wilkinson would go on to play important roles in suppressing the Whiskey Rebellion and Indian resistance in Ohio, all while remaining a Spanish agent. While some Americans suspected Wilkinson’s duplicity, he remained a senior officer in the US Army.

Pinckney Treaty

In 1795, Spain finally decided it needed a treaty with the US.  Spanish minister Godoy sent word that they would like to discuss the matter.

Thomas Pickney, the US ambassador to Britain ended up being tasked with the negotiations..  Pinckney came from a prominent South Carolina family. His mother, Eliza Lucas Pickney introduced indigo as a cash crop in South Carolina.  His father moved the family back to England when he was three, so Thomas grew up there.  After studying law at Oxford and Middle Temple, he returned to America in 1774, just before the war began.  He received a commission as a captain in the Continental Army and served as an aide-de-camp to Horatio Gates.  He was captured at Camden and spent more than a year on parole.  After being exchanged, he fought under Lafayette in Virginia.

Pickney got elected Governor of South Carolina in 1787.  In 1792, he accepted an appointment from President Washington to serve as ambassador to Britain.  During the disputes with Britain, Pinckney was unable to reach any agreement. That was when Washington sent Chief Justice John Jay to negotiate with British leaders.  Pinckney assisted Jay with those negotiations.

It was the results of these negotiations, the Jay Treaty, that finally got Spain’s attention.  To Spain, the Jay Treaty marked the establishment of a new Anglo-American alliance that would probably work to Spain’s detriment.  Officials even feared that there might be secret articles in that treaty that agreed to a joint British and American invasion of Spanish colonies in America.

Following word of the Jay Treaty, Spain saw itself in a difficult situation.  Spain had joined Britain in the war with Revolutionary France in 1793.  Spain suspected that France would be weak and disorganized after the execution of King Louis.  France was also at war with Prussia, the Netherlands, several German states, and had just gone to war with Britain.

Spain looked on the situation as would any European power at the time; their neighbor was weak, so this was a good time to attack and take some territory from them.  Spain joined the coalition against Revolutionary France and went to war.  The war did not go as Spain had hoped, resulting in the ministry wanting to bail and end the war with France.

During treaty negotiations with France, Spain wanted the return of certain border regions that the French Army had taken from them.  In return, French negotiators demanded the return of Louisiana, but Spain refused.  Instead, Spain gave France its claims on Santo Domingo, where French Haiti shared the island with Spanish Dominica in the West Indies. France would now control the entire island. 

The negotiations, which took place in Basel, Switzerland, not only ended the war between Spain and France. Prussia and Hesse-Kassel also reached agreements with France.  This left Britain without its major allies in its war with France.  These peace agreements angered Britain, which began attacking Spanish shipping.  The result was that Spain was in an even weaker position, especially if America was allying itself with Britain.  So Spanish officials were motivated to get on America’s good side by signing an agreeable treaty.

Even before the Basel treaty between Spain and France was signed, Spanish minister Godoy invited Secretary of State Pinckney to Madrid to begin talks.  Pinckney arrived in Spain at the end of June, 1795, just days before Spain completed its peace treaty with France.

Godoy hoped to join the US into a triple alliance with France and Spain to fight against Britain.  Pickney would not agree to anything like that.  President Washington’s policy was to remain neutral and to stay out of all European alliances that might drag the US into war.

Pinckney wanted a treaty that would establish the borders between Spain and the US, and which would guarantee free US navigation of the Mississippi River.  For the first month or so of negotiations, neither side seemed willing to cede much.

One of the big disputes, other than use of the Mississippi River, was over the southern US border.  East of the Mississippi, Spain controlled all the land along the gulf coast.  Spain had established military outposts as far north as Vicksburg, on the Mississippi River, about 170 miles north of New Orleans.  This area between the Mississippi and Chattahoochee Rivers covers about one third of the modern day states of Mississippi and Alabama.  Spain claimed that all of this was Spanish territory.  Britain had made it part of East and West Florida, which it had ceded to Spain after the Revolution.

US negotiators countered that Britain had set the southern border at 31 degrees parallel in its peace treaty with the US.  This was about 100 miles south of the border that Spain wanted.  At first, neither side seemed willing to budge on this issue.

Once the Treaty of Basel became public in August though, everything seemed to change. Godoy was ready to agree to just about any treaty with the US, just hoping to keep them from acting in an alliance with Britain.

Spain gave in on just about everything.  It set the east-west border in the center of the Mississippi River and guaranteed free navigation of the river out to the Gulf of Mexico.  The only limitation would be that free navigation would only be for Americans and Spanish.  Third parties were still prohibited from using the river.

Spain accepted the US southern border at 31 degrees parallel.  It abandoned all claims north of that line and agreed to evacuate all of its forts in the territory within six months after treaty ratification.

Finally, Spain dropped its demands for any sort of military alliance with the US.  The US would not be under any obligation to protect any Spanish land claims against third parties, not even in America.

There were a few other minor disputes to be worked out, such as the requirement that US merchants pay government fees for goods stored in New Orleans.  The two parties agreed that there would be no such fees for at least three years.  There was also a dispute over US merchant ships that Spain had already seized.  The parties agreed on the establishment of a commission to hear those claims.

US Reaction

The two parties signed the treaty at the end of October, 1795 at San Lorenzo el Real, the summer residence of the Spanish Court.  

Some Spanish officials were aghast at the terms that Spain had given away.  Louisiana Governor Carondelet was convinced the treaty would never be finalized when the king saw the terms to which Godoy had agreed.  Spanish colonial leaders saw the treaty as a complete sellout of everything they had worked for, for years.  Despite these feelings, King Carlos approved the treaty.

In the US, the feeling was quite different.  News of the treaty reached Philadelphia in January, 1796 and a copy arrived a few weeks later.  The treaty gave the US everything it wanted, especially the long sought-after use of the Mississippi River, and required almost no concessions.  It mostly sought the good will of America, which was happily given. 

There was virtually no opposition or concerns expressed about the terms. The Senate unanimously ratified the treaty in March, 1796. The final formal ratifications were exchanged in Spain on April 25.  Pinckney became the toast of America.

Next Week: The Yazoo Land Scandal in western Georgia

 - - -

Next Episode 393 Yazoo Land Scandal 

Previous Episode 391 Washington Admin Scandals and Resignations

 Contact me via email at mtroy.history@gmail.com

 Follow the podcast on X (formerly Twitter) @AmRevPodcast

 Join the Facebook group, American Revolution Podcast 

 Join American Revolution Podcast on Quora 
 
Discuss the AmRev Podcast on Reddit

American Revolution Podcast Merch!

T-shirts, hoodies, mugs, pillows, totes, notebooks, wall art, and more.  Get your favorite American Revolution logo today.  Help support this podcast.  https://merch.amrevpodcast.com


American Revolution Podcast is distributed 100% free of charge. If you can chip in to help defray my costs, I'd appreciate whatever you can give.  Make a one time donation through my PayPal account. You may also donate via Venmo (@Michael-Troy-20).


Click here to see my Patreon Page
You can support the American Revolution Podcast as a Patreon subscriber.  This is an option making monthly pledges.  Patreon support will give you access to ad-free episodes, podcast extras, and help make the podcast a sustainable project.

An alternative to Patreon is SubscribeStar.  For anyone who has problems with Patreon, you can get the same benefits by subscribing at SubscribeStar.

Signup for the AmRev Podcast Mail List

* indicates required

Further Reading

Websites

Treaty of San Lorenzo/ Pinckney’s Treaty, 1795 https://history.state.gov/milestones/1784-1800/pickney-treaty

Pinckney Treaty 1795 - Transcript https://www.emersonkent.com/historic_documents/pinckney_treaty_1795_transcript.htm

Whitaker, Arthur Preston. “New Light on the Treaty of San Lorenzo: An Essay in Historical Criticism.” The Mississippi Valley Historical Review, vol. 15, no. 4, 1929, pp. 435–54. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1897880

Young, Raymond A. “Pinckney’s Treaty-A New Perspective.” The Hispanic American Historical Review, vol. 43, no. 4, 1963, pp. 526–35. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2509900

Free eBooks
(from archive.org unless noted)

Bemis, Samuel F. Pinckney’s Treaty: A Study of America’s Advantage from Europe’s Distress, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1926. 

De Pedro, Jose The Spanish in New Orleans and Louisiana, Gretna: Pelican Publishing, 2000. (borrow only) 

Din, Gilbert C. (ed) The Spanish Presence in Louisiana 1763-1803, Center for Louisiana Studies, 1996 (borrow only). 

Gayarre, Charles History of Louisiana: The Spanish Domination, New York: Redfield, 1854. 

Holmes, Jack D.L. A Guide to Spanish Louisiana, [self-published] 1970 (borrow only). 

Monette, John W. History of the discovery and settlement of the valley of the Mississippi, by the three great European powers, Spain, France, and Great Britain, and the subsequent occupation, settlement, and extension of civil government by the United States, until the year 1846. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1848. 

Pickney, Charles C. The Life of General Thomas Pinckney, Boston: Houghton Mifflin and Co. 1895. 

Robertson, James A. Louisiana Under the Rule of Spain, France and the United States 1785-1807, Vol. 2, Cleveland: Arthur H. Clark Co. 1911. 

Books Worth Buying
(links to Amazon.com unless otherwise noted)*

Elkins, Stanley M. and Eric McKitrick, The Age of Federalism: The Early American Republic, 1788–1800, Oxford Univ. Press, 1993 (borrow on archive.org). 

Linklater, Andro An Artist in Treason: The  Extraordinary Double Life of General James Wilkinson, Walker Publishing, 2009.

Roderiguez, John E. Spanish New Orleans: An Imperial City on the American Periphery, 1766–1803, LSU Press, 2021. 

 * As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Sunday, June 21, 2026

ARP391 Washington Admin Scandals and Resignations

George Washington had made no secret of the fact that he really didn’t want to be president.  National leaders had to convince and cajole him into doing it, telling him that without his leadership, the Constitution would not survive and, without the Constitution, the United States would fall apart.  Washington served for four years, expecting to get the new nation off to a good start, then finally retire to his plantation in Virginia.  Once again, national leaders begged him to remain for a second term.

I think Washington really regretted his decision to remain for a second term.  Some of his most controversial issues arose in that term, including the Citizen Genet Affair, the Whiskey Rebellion, the Jay Treaty controversies.  Also, by half-way through his second term, his cabinet members all abandoned him.

Postmaster General

Resignations were normal in government.  Postmaster General John Osgood had left during the first term.  The Postmaster General was not a part of the cabinet at the time and really didn’t have any role in policy making aside from running the post office.  Osgood, originally from Massachusetts, had been living in New York, working first under the Confederation Congress then under President Washington.  When the capital moved from New York to Philadelphia in 1791, Osgood did not want to move and resigned instead.

Edmund Randolph
Washington’s second postmaster, Timothy Pickering, deserves a little more background because he will play larger role going forward.  He had been adjutant general and quartermaster general of the Continental Army during the Revolution.   Although Pickering was born and raised in Massachusetts, he moved to the Wyoming Valley in Pennsylvania after the war.  

There, he got caught up in the Yankee-Pennamite Wars, which I discussed a bit in earlier episodes during the Revolutionary War.  This ongoing fight was between Yankees from Connecticut and Pennsylvanians who both claimed control of the Wyoming Valley. The Pennsylvania State Assembly appointed Pickering as an official in the newly-formed Luzerne County, tasked with mediating conflicting land claims between settlers.

It was in this capacity that some Connecticut settlers kidnapped Pickering in 1788, trying to force him to recognize their land claims.  Pickering refused to negotiate with his kidnappers and was dragged through the forest while Pennsylvania militia were trying to track them down.  After nearly three weeks, his captors released him.  

Pickering spent the next few years taking time away from his farm to help negotiate some of the treaties with Indians regarding control of land in western Pennsylvania and the Ohio Territory.  President Washington offered him several jobs, including Quartermaster General of the new army, but Pickering declined.  He finally accepted the role of Postmaster General in 1791. 

Pickering would serve as postmaster for about three and a half years before moving on to become Secretary of War.  We'll get into the reasons reasons for that shortly. Joseph Habersham succeeded him in the role, and continued in that role until the Jefferson Administration.

Habersham was from Georgia. He had served as a colonel in the Continental Army, but resigned after serving as Lachlan McIntosh’s second in the 1777 duel that killed Button Gwinnett, a signer of the Declaration of Independence.

After the war, Habersham remained active in Georgia politics where he served as Speaker of the Georgia House.  He was serving as mayor of Savannah when Washington appointed him Postmaster General.  

Secretary of State

The first cabinet member to resign was Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson.  When Washington first appointed Jefferson the two men seemed to get along well.  As Washington’s first term came to an end, Jefferson was among those who begged Washington to accept a second term.  Washington, in turn, asked that Jefferson stay on as Secretary of State.

Jefferson and Hamilton regularly found themselves on opposite sides of many issues.  The Bank of the United States was a big one.  But what really divided the two men was foreign policy.  Hamilton wanted a good economic relationship with Britain, while Jefferson wanted closer ties to France.  

Washington’s effort to form consensus on these divergent views was to begin having cabinet meetings where they could all sit around a table together, hash out their differences, and reach an agreeable solution.  Jefferson hated these meetings. He referred to his conflicts with Hamilton there as being “daily pitted in the cabinet like two cocks.”  This was a reference to cock fighting, a popular pastime where gamblers would throw two chickens into an arena, known as a cock pit, where the two animals would try to peck each other to death.

Jefferson came to believe that Hamilton had a growing influence over Washington, who seemed to be siding more and more with policies that favored Britain abroad and rich bankers and investors domestically.  To counter this, Jefferson began subsidizing Philip Freneau, who published the National Gazette, which regularly attacked Washington.  When the paper published a cartoon showing Washington being sent to the guillotine, Washington lost his temper and railed against the paper that Jefferson continued to support.

Finally, at the end of 1793, less than a year into Washington’s second term Jefferson had had enough.  He submitted his resignation.  Washington said he accepted it with regret and felt deserted by Jefferson.  

After returning to private life, Jefferson continued to attack Washington as becoming too senile and becoming the puppet of Hamilton and the Federalists.  In 1796, Jefferson wrote a letter to a friend where he referred to former revolutionary heroes as “apostates” who had been “shorn by the harlot England”.  This letter eventually became public and Washington took personal offense at this, wrote Jefferson a letter bluntly expressing his offense, and the men ceased all communication. They would never reconcile.

Attorney General Edmond Randolph took over as Secretary of State following Jefferson’s departure.  Randolph resigned after about a year and a half, for reasons we’ll get into in a moment.  Timothy Pickering completed the remainder of Washington’s term as Secretary of State. 

Secretary of War

The next secretary to depart was Henry Knox.  During the Revolutionary War, the 25 year old Boston bookseller became one of General Washington’s most reliable general officers.  After the war, Knox moved to a capacity, serving in charge of the army under the Confederation Congress.  Washington happily asked Knox to continue in that role when he became President.

Washington tended to regard most of his cabinet secretaries as advisors.  His relationship with Knox was a little different.  Perhaps it was because Washington felt most knowledgeable personally in military matters, he tended to treat Knox more like a staff assistant than an advisor.  He would give Knox instructions rather than ask his opinion on many matters of military policy.

At the same time though, Knox held Washington’s trust and confidence.  Hamilton once remarked near the beginning of President Washington’s first term that Washington spoke with Knox the way a man does with his wife.  Knox generally aligned himself with Hamilton as a Federalist and seemed to have a solid relationship with the president.

That relationship began to fall apart in 1794. The incident that caused the rift came during the Whiskey Rebellion. 

After the Revolutionary War ended, Knox lived extravagantly.  He rented a downtown mansion in Philadelphia where he lived with Lucy and his children.  Lucy also enjoyed gambling and loved to play cards with Philadelphia's elite.  The salary of a government bureaucrat simply did not support this lifestyle.  So Knox engaged in land speculation to supplement his wealth.

Knox borrowed heavily to make investments in the Ohio Company.  He also partnered with William Duer to purchase two million acres of land in Maine.  During this time, Knox built a 19 room mansion in Thomaston, Maine, which he named Montpelier.

I mentioned Duer back in Episode 379 when his speculation led to the financial panic of 1792 and his bankruptcy.  Knox was hit hard by those events and was struggling on the edge of bankruptcy himself. 

By the summer of 1794 Knox’s financial situation had reached a crisis point.  Knox had to request six week’s leave from his position so that he could travel to Maine and settle some of the financial problems related to his property there.

The timing could not have been worse.  This was at the height of the Whiskey Rebellion and just around the time that Washington issued his call to raise a militia army to crush that rebellion.  This was one of the most critical times for the Secretary of War.  Washington reluctantly approved the leave but he was not happy about it.  When Knox ended up being gone for, not for six weeks but for more than two months, Washington grew even angrier.

Hamilton happily filled in for Knox, accompanying Washington to western Pennsylvania.  But while he was going to war, the president wanted his secretary of war by his side, not the treasury secretary.  When Knox returned to Philadelphia in October, he sent a note to Washington, who was still out in the field with the army, whether he wanted Knox to join him.  Washington sent a curt response, essentially saying it was too late to be useful.  Washington was already on his way back to Philadelphia by this time.

Two months later, at the end of December, Knox submitted his resignation. Knox cited financial reasons for his resignation.  Washington, still annoyed by Knox’s absence during the Whiskey Rebellion, accepted the resignation, in a way which witnesses called frosty and overly formal. Knox returned to Maine, where he sold much of his lands to stay out of debtor’s prison.  He eventually resolved his finances, but his public life was at an end.  Despite Washington's coolness toward Knox at the end of his term, the to men remained close friends and continued to correspond with each other until Washington's passing.

Timothy Pickering replaced Knox as Secretary of War, serving in that role for less than a year before moving on to Secretary of State in 1796. James McHenry replaced Pickering at the War Department.  McHenry was a surgeon from Maryland.  He served as a Continental officer during the Revolution.  After the war, he served in the Maryland Senate and as a delegate to the Continental Congress.  McHenry would remain in that position for the rest of Washington's term and into Adams' term.

Secretary of Treasury

Alexander Hamilton also left for money reasons.  Hamilton had been the youngest member of the cabinet, and arguably the most impactful on the new government.  He had served as an aid to Washington for most of the Revolution. Washington had come to admire and respect his abilities, especially in matters of finance.

During his tenure as Treasury Secretary, Hamilton became the de facto leader of the Federalists and also a lightning rod for abuse from the Democratic Republicans.  The main cause of criticism was that Hamilton was imposing a British style economy, where much of the nation’s wealth went to speculators and financiers who did not really work for a living.  Opponents believed that this would eventually result in a form of aristocracy, similar to the system in Britain, which they hated.

At the beginning of Washington’s second term, William Branch Giles, a Congressman from Virginia introduced a resolution to investigate Hamilton.  Giles was a young man, only 27 years old when first elected to Congress.  Giles was the first Representative to win a special election in 1790, replacing Theodorick Bland, who had died in office.

Giles aligned himself with the Jefferson-Madison faction in Congress. This faction not only opposed many of Hamilton’s economic plans, they also suspected that there was an element of corruption.  Hamilton might be enriching himself or his friends in these transactions, at the expense of the treasury.

At the end of December, 1792, Congress demanded a full accounting of some loans that Hamilton had taken in order to repay other loans that had a higher interest rate.  Hamilton submitted a report to congress a week later, on January 3, 1793, explaining the transactions.  That was not good enough for Giles.  A few weeks later, he introduced a series of resolutions, demanding much more details including the names of people who profited from the transactions.  

These resolutions essentially accused Hamilton of financial misconduct.  Specifically, private investors in the Bank of the United States would benefit from these transactions.  The resolutions censored Hamilton’s behavior and attacked his honesty.

Giles did not come up with this on his own.  Jefferson had worked secretly with Giles in developing the resolutions.  Jefferson was still a member of Washington’s cabinet at this time.  Jefferson was open about his opposition. He spoke with Washington about his concerns that Hamilton was hiding financial problems with the bank with these transactions.  But he kept his cooperation with Giles a secret.

In the end, Congress refused to pass the resolutions.  Their attacks on Hamilton were unfounded.  Jefferson probably knew this from the beginning, but figured that some mud from the discussion would stick to Hamilton, even if he was ultimately exonerated. 

Hamilton would remain as Treasury Secretary for several more years.  But, like Henry Knox, Hamilton’s lifestyle was not possible on his salary as a member of the Cabinet.  

Ironically, the attacks by Giles and the other Democratic Republicans delayed Hamilton’s departure. He would have resigned sooner than he did, but stayed on until he was absolved of all the accusations in the Giles Resolutions.  Had he quit before, many would have taken that as an admission of guilt.

When Hamilton finally resigned on January 31, 1795, he was nearly broke.  He returned to private practice as an attorney in New York in order to rebuild his wealth.

Following Hamilton’s departure, Oliver Wolcott took over at Treasury.  Wolcott was from Connecticut.  He began working with the Treasury Department under Hamilton as soon as it was formed.  He first worked as an auditor, then serving as Comptroller.  When he replaced Hamilton as Secretary, little changed. Wolcott greatly admired Hamilton and even kept up a vigorous correspondence with Hamilton when Hamilton returned to New York.  Hamilton’s critics complained that Hamilton was still running the Treasury Department and influencing President Washington, just using Wolcott as the conduit for his policies and ideas.

Attorney General

Attorney General Edmund Randolph was the last to go.  He had served as the President’s legal advisor for many years, even before he became president.  Unlike other members of the cabinet, he was also able to take on other private legal clients to supplement his government salary. We saw last week when Randolph represented Chisholm in the case of Chisholm v. Georgia that led to the adoption of the 11th Amendment.

After Jefferson resigned as Secretary of State, Randolph moved over to State.  William Bradford took over as the new Attorney General.  Bradford was from Philadelphia.  He had served as attorney general of Pennsylvania and on the state Supreme Court before joining the administration.  Bradford seemed to be a man with a great legal future ahead of him.  He was still in his late 30s while serving as attorney general.  Sadly, he became ill and died during the summer of 1795.

Charles Lee next took over as Attorney General. This is not General Charles Lee from the Revolution.  This Charles Lee was the younger brother of Henry “Light-Horse Harry” Lee.  He was a capable attorney who had some experience in the Virginia legislature.  I suspect his being a part of the powerful Lee family contributed to Washington’s decision to appoint him.

Fauchet Scandal

Randolph’s final departure as Secretary of State came under a cloud of scandal involving French minister Jean Antoine Fauchet.  Recall that France had sent Fauchet in late 1793 to clean up the mess created by Citizen Genet that destroyed relations between France and the US.

During Fauchet’s first year in America the Whiskey Rebellion took center stage.  That same year, John Jay was in London negotiating a treaty with Britain that French officials worried would destroy the Franco-American alliance.

Fauchet tried to build relationships with top US officials, including Edmund Randolph.  In late October, Fauchet sent a secret dispatch, known as dispatch number 10, to officials in Paris.  His report attacks the Washington administration on a number of issues  It describes the Washington administration as decrepit.  It mentions Randolph as a “confidant” and reports Randolph’s concerns that federalist policies supported by Washington are giving rise to what he calls a “financiering class” that wants to restore monarchy in America and enslave American trade to England.

He also reports that Randolph suggests that for a few thousand dollars, he can influence the outcome of the Whiskey Rebellion in a way that would benefit France.  The dispatch is a cynical analysis of American politics that suggests a few bribes could influence government policy and says explicitly that all of these patriots have their price.

Fauchet put the dispatch aboard a ship headed to Paris.  A British warship intercepted it, and sent the letter to London.  Officials there forwarded the dispatch to British Ambassador George Hammond in Philadelphia.  In late July, Hammond shared the document with Treasury Secretary Wolcott, who, in turn, shared it with Secretary of War Pickering.  At the time, Washington was home at Mount Vernon.

Pickering and Wolcott viewed the dispatch as evidence that Randolph has asked the French Ambassador for a bribe, and is also committing treason by undercutting American policy in favor of France.

All of these events are unfolding in the period just after the Senate has ratified the Jay Treaty, the public is just learning about the Treaty’s terms, and President Washington is debating whether to sign it.

Washington returns to Philadelphia to deal with the matter.  After reading the dispatch and discussing it with Wolcott and Pickering, the president determines that Randolph is essentially a French agent.  At the time, Randolph was the only cabinet member opposing the Jay Treaty.  

After Washington returned to Philadelphia in August, he decided to end this dithering and sign the Jay treaty right away, before the scandal over Randolph broke.  He ordered Randolph to inform Minister Hammond and to send a signed copy of the treaty to London.

Once that was done, Washington called Randolph into his office.  There, with Wolcott and Pickering present, Washington showed the dispatch to Randolph and demanded an answer.  Randolph read the document as best he could.  It was in French.  After a short discussion, Randolph was asked to leave the room while Washington discussed the matter with the others.  When Randolph returned, Washington demanded a written explanation of the allegations in the dispatch.  Since these involved some matters that took place more than a year ago, Randolph said he wanted to consult with other records before writing his version of events.

Randolph believed that Washington was convinced that he was guilty of something, maybe treason, maybe just disloyalty, but it was clear that the President did not believe there was an innocent explanation for the allegations made in the dispatch.  Instead of writing an explanation, Randolph returned home and drafted his letter of resignation.

Randolph’s departure marked the last of the men who made up Washington’s original cabinet.

Next Week: A treaty with Spain changes US borders and opens up the Mississippi River to America for the first time.

 - - -

Next Episode 392 The Treaty of San Lorenzo 

Previous Episode 390 The Eleventh Amendment

 Contact me via email at mtroy.history@gmail.com

 Follow the podcast on X (formerly Twitter) @AmRevPodcast

 Join the Facebook group, American Revolution Podcast 

 Join American Revolution Podcast on Quora 
 
Discuss the AmRev Podcast on Reddit

American Revolution Podcast Merch!

T-shirts, hoodies, mugs, pillows, totes, notebooks, wall art, and more.  Get your favorite American Revolution logo today.  Help support this podcast.  https://merch.amrevpodcast.com


American Revolution Podcast is distributed 100% free of charge. If you can chip in to help defray my costs, I'd appreciate whatever you can give.  Make a one time donation through my PayPal account. You may also donate via Venmo (@Michael-Troy-20).


Click here to see my Patreon Page
You can support the American Revolution Podcast as a Patreon subscriber.  This is an option making monthly pledges.  Patreon support will give you access to ad-free episodes, podcast extras, and help make the podcast a sustainable project.

An alternative to Patreon is SubscribeStar.  For anyone who has problems with Patreon, you can get the same benefits by subscribing at SubscribeStar.

Signup for the AmRev Podcast Mail List

* indicates required

Further Reading

Websites

George Washington Cabinet Members: https://www.mountvernon.org/library/digitalhistory/digital-encyclopedia/article/cabinet-members

Timothy Pickering Papers: https://www.masshist.org/collection-guides/view/fa0256

Jefferson and Hamilton: Political Rivals in Washington's Cabinet https://www.mountvernon.org/george-washington/the-first-president/washingtons-presidential-cabinet/jefferson-and-hamilton-political-rivals

Jefferson and the Giles Resolutions https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01-25-02-0259-0001

“Introductory Note: Report on the Balance of All Unapplied Revenues at the End of the Year 1792 and on All Unapplied Monies Which May Have Been Obtained by the Several Loans Authorized by Law, [4 February 1793],” Founders Online, National Archives, https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Hamilton/01-13-02-0299-0001

Giles Resolutions: https://rationalwalk.com/the-giles-resolutions

Sheridan, Eugene R. “Thomas Jefferson and the Giles Resolutions.” The William and Mary Quarterly, vol. 49, no. 4, 1992, pp. 589–608. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2947173 

Clifford, John Garry. “A Muddy Middle of the Road: The Politics of Edmund Randolph, 1790-1795.” The Virginia Magazine of History and Biography 80 (1972): 286-311. JSTOR http://www.jstor.org/stable/4247732 

Bonsteel Tachau, Mary K. “George Washington and the Reputation of Edmund Randolph.” The Journal of American History, vol. 73, no. 1, 1986, pp. 15–34. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1903604

Translation [of a letter from] ... Joseph Fauchet, minister plenipotentiary of the French Republic near the United States, to Mr. Randolph, Secretary of State of the United States https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.hxj4gf&seq=1

Free eBooks
(from archive.org unless noted)

Fauchett, Joseph A Translation of Citizen Fauchet's Political Dispatch, No. 10 , Philadelphia: T. Bradford, 179

Conway, Moncure Daniel. Omitted Chapters of History Disclosed in the Life and Papers of Edmund Randolph, New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1889. 

Randolph, Edmund A Vindication of Edmund Randolph, Richmond, Charles H. Winne, 1855. 

Books Worth Buying
(links to Amazon.com unless otherwise noted)*

Chernow, Ron Alexander Hamilton, Penguin Press, 2004. 

Chernow, Ron Washington, A Life, Penguin Press, 2010. 

Chervinsky, Lindsay M. The Cabinet: George Washington and the Creation of an American Institution, Belknap Press, 2020. 

Elkins, Stanley M. and Eric McKitrick, The Age of Federalism: The Early American Republic, 1788–1800, Oxford Univ. Press, 1993 (borrow on archive.org). 

Ellis, Joseph J. His Excellency. George Washington, Alfred A. Knopf, 2005. 

Heidler, David S. & Jeanne T. Washington's Circle: The Creation of the President, Random House, 2015. 

Leibiger, Stuart Founding Friendship George Washington, James Madison, and the Creation of the American Republic, Univ. of Virginia Press, 1999. 

Malone, Dumas Jefferson and the Ordeal of Liberty, Little Brown & Co. 1962 (borrow on archive.org).

Meacham, Jon Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power, Random House, 2012

Miller, John C. Alexander Hamilton and the Growth of the New Nation (or Portrait in Paradox), Harper & Brothers, 1959 (borrow on archive.org

Nester, William The Hamiltonian Vision, 1789-1800, Potomac Books, 2012. 

Randall, Willard Sterne Thomas Jefferson: A Life, Henry Holt and Co. 1993.

Reardon, John J. Edmund Randolph: A Biography, Macmillan, 1975 (borrow on archive.org

Unger, Harlow G. "Mr. President": George Washington and the Making of the Nation's Highest Office, Da Capo Press, 2013.

Warren, Jack D. The Presidency of George Washington, Univ. of Va. Press, 1996 (borrow on archive.org).

Winik, Jay  The Great Upheaval: America and the Birth of the Modern World, 1788-1800, HarperCollins, 2007. 

 * As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.