Sunday, November 8, 2026

ARP406 The Alien Acts of 1798

Over the last few weeks, we’ve covered the efforts in the spring and summer of 1798 to build an army and navy to fight a war with France. As fear over war with France grew, Congress turned its attention to foreigners living in America and whether they would be a threat to the country. This week we will look at Congress’ efforts to create laws to deport foreigners living in America.

Immigration Concerns

Concerns over immigration were nothing new.  There were concerns that the American experiment would be destroyed by European immigrants who clung to ideas on monarchism as the best basis for government.  These immigrants could arrive in large numbers, overwhelm the country, and eventually out-vote the Americans who supported free self-government.

Near the end of the Revolutionary War, Jefferson wrote about the immigration problem, later published in his Notes on the State of Virginia.

Every species of government has its specific principles. Ours perhaps are more peculiar than those of any other in the universe. It is a composition of the freest principles of the English constitution, with others derived from natural right and natural reason. To these nothing can be more opposed than the maxims of absolute monarchies. Yet, from such, we are to expect the greatest number of emigrants. They will bring with them the principles of the governments they leave, imbibed in their early youth; or, if able to throw them off, it will be in exchange for an unbounded licentiousness, passing, as is usual, from one extreme to another. It would be a miracle were they to stop precisely at the point of temperate liberty. These principles, with their language, they will transmit to their children. In proportion to their numbers, they will share with us the legislation. They will infuse into it their spirit, warp and bias its direction, and render it a heterogeneous, incoherent, distracted mass.

Cinque-Têtes or the Paris Monster, 1797
Despite such concerns, Congress passed its initial naturalization laws in 1792, allowing free white immigrants to apply for citizenship after two years.  Very quickly, it had second thoughts.  French Catholic immigrants began arriving after the beginning of the French Revolution.  Congress altered the Naturalization Act in 1795 to extend the residency requirement to five years.  It also required an applicant to renounce any title of nobility, to provide proof of good moral character, and to support the US Constitution.

The arrival of French royalist refugees from the French Revolution gave rise to fears among Democratic Republicans that these people would support having a king in their newly adopted countries, just as Jefferson had suggested in his notes.  At the same time, Federalists feared that many of these refugees would include radical Jacobins who spread a powerful anti-English sentiment and bring to America the radicalism that led to the reign of terror in France.

Another fear, more specific to the south, developed regarding French refugees, who came primarily from what became Haiti.  Many of them arrived with their slaves, mostly settling in Charleston.  There was a fear that these slaves might spread ideas from the Haitian Revolution that would lead to a slave revolt in America.

The Irish Problem

Perhaps one of the greatest fears, however, came from the growing influx of Irish immigrants. French immigrants were a concern, but they probably never exceeded 10,000 over the course of the 1790s.  The Irish immigrated in much larger numbers.  In 1790, the greater Philadelphia area had about 44,000 total residents.  Over the course of the 1790s nearly 30,000 Irish immigrants settled in and around the city.  Many of those came in 1798 and 1799 following a failed uprising in Ireland in 1798.

In 1798, Ireland was very different from what it would become in the early 19th century, and what it is like today. Ireland had its own Parliament. Catholics could not vote, and the districts were drawn so that English lords held a majority of seats in the Irish Parliament.  There was no requirement that voting districts have equal representation.  So-called pocket districts consisted of only a few hundred people, with the only votes coming from the lord who owned the land.  The English Parliament also asserted the power to override the Irish Parliament on anything.  So most Irish people did not have their views on anything respected by the government. Also, the majority of Irish people still spoke Gaelic, not English.  

Since political power leads to economic power, the Irish people suffered under a system where most of the country’s productivity went to English landlords.  High rents, taxes, tithes, and military repression kept most Irish families on the brink of survival.  It was not just the Catholics who suffered, the Presbyterians in Northern Ireland suffered under the same poor treatment.

Of course, many Irishmen wanted to change this.  The Society of United Irishmen formed under a young revolutionary named Wolfe Tone.  He hoped to unite Catholic and Protestant Irishmen in an effort to resist English abuses.  Tone moved to Philadelphia in 1795, eventually buying a farm near Princeton  He began working with the more radical republican groups and the French Ambassador to organize a revolution for Ireland.  He traveled to France in 1796 to advocate for the French invasion of Ireland, which would serve as the core for an Irish rebellion.  Tone joined the Irish legion which fought for France. 

France took a fleet into the Irish Sea in 1796, but it never landed due to weather and other problems.  This led to an English crackdown in Ireland, but the United Irishmen remained active, hoping for French intervention.

In 1797, again as advocated by Tone, a Dutch fleet sailed to Ireland.  The Dutch had formed the Batavian Republic which was controlled by France.  The fleet landed some soldiers, but again bad weather forced them to call off the plan. The British Navy found and destroyed the enemy fleet.

Thanks to an informer, the British received information that the United Irishmen had about a quarter of a million men ready to rise up and join with France to free Ireland.  In March, 1798, British soldiers seized the entire leadership committee in Ireland.  Britain imposed martial law and appointed General Gerard Lake as commander.  Lake had been a lieutenant colonel who had surrendered at Yorktown.  Now a major general, he used torture and violence to root out and destroy any potential rebels.

The response was an all out uprising in May.  One of the larger battles, Vinegar Hill in County Wexford, saw the use of 20,000 British regulars  As things got more serious, the British appointed General Charles Cornwallis as Lord Lieutenant of Ireland.

France considered sending support, but ultimately decided to use the bulk of its resources to support Napoleon’s campaign in Egypt.  Instead, France landed only 1000 soldiers in August to help arm and supply Irish rebels.  

General Lake managed to trap the French and Irish Army at Ballinamuck, after a brief fight, the French surrendered.  The French prisoners were treated well.  The Irish contingent either fought or fled, expecting no mercy.  Those who were caught were executed.

On September 23, the last of the French forces were defeated at Killala.  Not aware of the surrender, a second French fleet with 3000 soldiers, including Wolfe Tone, departed from Brest for Ireland.  A British fleet engaged and defeated the French, capturing the ship with Tone aboard.  The Irish rebel was tried and sentenced to hang.  He committed suicide in prison before execution of sentence.

All of this meant that thousands of Irish fled to America to escape the war and violence taking place at home.  

Response to Immigration

Irish cooperation with France meant that these immigrants tended to fit in very well politically with the Democratic-Republicans.  Federalists viewed these immigrants as a direct threat to Federalist control of the government.

Federalists had welcomed immigration initially, mostly when the immigrants consisted of French royalist refugees fleeing the revolution.  The new immigrants, however, were lining up politically against them.  Something had to be done or they feared the changing demographics would end Federalist rule.

Federalists accused the Democratic Republicans of a conspiracy to bring immigrants into the US to gain political advantage.  They even accused them of allowing Irish immigrants to vote illegally before becoming citizens.

Federalist newspapers railed about how the Irish would destroy America.  The Irish were considered too primitive and violent to live in a civilized society like America.  They blamed the Irish for street protests against government policies, including the Jay Treaty protests, and characterized their protests as evidence of the rise of mob rule.

Federalist Congressman Harrison Gray Otis, a nephew of Boston radical James Otis, gave a speech in Congress where he proclaimed 

"I do not wish to invite hordes of wild Irishmen, nor the turbulent and disorderly of all parts of the world, to come here with a view to disturb our tranquility, after having succeeded in the overthrow of their own Governments."

The Irish were portrayed as beasts who needed to be caged.  Some opinions justified the English abuses in Ireland as the only way to tame such a wild people.  Conspiracy theorists argued that the Irish constituted a fifth column in America which would eventually rise up, overthrow the government, and bring a French Revolution level of violence to America. Some extremists in Congress even proposed ending all naturalization and only allowing US citizenship by birth.

William Cobbett, an English immigrant and Federalist pamphleteer wrote that Irish immigrants were "animated by the same infamous principles, and actuated by that same thirst for blood and plunder, which had reduced France to a vast human slaughter-house" and that their advocates should be treated “as we would a TURK, a JEW, a JACOBIN or a DOG.”

There were, of course, advocates for the other side.  Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans wanted the support of the newest Americans and argued against the attacks.  Albert Galatin, the guy who was involved in the Whiskey Rebellion, and an immigrant himself, became a leading advocate for immigration in the House of Representatives. 

Editor Benjamin Franklin Bache died in the Yellow Fever Epidemic of 1798, but the Aurora continued to publish under William Duane, also an immigrant. Although Duane’s parents were Irish, he was born in Newfoundland and raised in New York. He moved to London after the Revolutionary War and got involved in radical politics there.  He had to flee England during the controversies related to the Irish rebellion in 1796.  In 1797 Duane helped to form the Philadelphia Chapter of the American Society of United Irishmen.  He also supported black schools in Philadelphia, which led his opponents to conclude that he was also plotting a slave revolt in America.  Duane became a leading advocate for the Irish in America as well as a voice for radical views.  

Naturalization Act

Despite some defenders, the fear stoked by the Quasi-war with France encouraged Federalists to act. Representative Joshua Coit of Connecticut introduced legislation to suspend all naturalization of new citizens.  During the debates the Federalists explicitly argued the goal was to deny the right to vote to immigrants and reduce the number of Republican voters.  Some even wanted to make the ban permanent.  It was during this debate that Otis made his statement about “hordes of wild Irishmen” as a threat to the country.  

Another proposal would add a twenty-dollar tax on naturalization certificates.  This would ensure that poor immigrants could not afford naturalization.  Only the very wealthy could afford the entrance fee.

Opponents Albert Gallatin of Pennsylvania and Edward Livingston of New York convinced some moderate Federalists to oppose an indefinite naturalization ban.  Instead, the House compromised and extended the residency requirement for citizenship from 5 to 14 years.  All immigrants would also have to register within 48 hours of arrival and declare an intent to naturalize before that 14 year waiting period started.  The new law also barred any immigrants from a country with which the US was at war from becoming citizens.  

The final bill passed the House by a vote of 41 to 40.  President Adams signed it into law on June 17, 1798.

Alien Friends Act

Passage of the immigration act at least delayed the prospect of having immigrants vote in upcoming elections.  It did not, however, say anything about concerns over non-citizens living in the US.

The Federalists proposed another bill, initially called An Act Concerning Aliens.  It empowered the federal government to deport immigrants.  The details of how this would work took up much of Congress’ debate over the summer of 1798.

The Democratic Republicans realized that some sort of measure was going to pass Congress, so they got behind a bill entitled An Act Respecting Alien Enemies.  The Republican bill was more limited than the Federalist proposal since it only applied to people who came from a country with which the US was actually at war.  It authorized deporting people from enemy countries during war, but also protected naturalized citizens, and gave people a right to due process in court.  The Federalist bill had none of these safeguards.

The Republican bill which was limited to enemies in wartime was dubbed the Alien Enemies Act.  The Federalist bill, which applied to any immigrants at any time was dubbed the Alien Friends Act.

The Federalist majority in the Senate tabled the Alien Enemies Act and focused debate on the Alien Friends Act.  The Senate bill essentially gave blanket power to the President to “deport all such aliens as he shall judge dangerous to the peace and safety of the United States.”  The President had complete discretion to judge how dangerous someone was and to deport them without any sort of hearing or appeal.  The bill also proposed harsh punishments for anyone who attempted to interfere with the President’s orders.

During debate the Republicans tried to soften the bill. Kentucky Senator Humphrey Marshall proposed an amendment that the president issue a warrant of deportation to record the cause for removal for each person.  The Senate rejected this amendment and passed the bill giving pretty much complete authority to the president with no oversight from anyone else, not Congress, not the courts, not the states.

When the bill went to the House, Gallatin attacked its constitutionality.  One argument was that the Federal government had no authority to remove aliens.  It only had power over naturalization as citizens.  If states wanted to have non-citizens living in their states, the Constitution permitted that.  His second argument was the complete lack of due process. The law gave the president arbitrary control over the lives of millions of immigrants with no one able to check or even question his use of that power.

The House managed to limit the provision requiring all aliens to register to those who entered the country after the law was passed.  It would not apply retroactively.  Also, a provision allowed those with a deportation order to challenge that order before a person appointed by the president, to make the case that they were not a danger, and could be given a license to remain in the US.  Most importantly, this law was arguably to meet an immediate emergency.  It would expire after two years.

The final bill narrowly passed the House, approved by the Senate and signed into law on June 25, 1798.

President Adams, however, chose not to use this power very much. Although Secretary of State Pickering regularly requested that Adams sign piles of blank warrants to provide Federal marshals, Adams only ever signed three warrants.

One was for Pierre Samuel du Pont de Nemours, a wealthy Frenchman who originally supported the French Revolution but became a target of it when he proved insufficiently radical.  It seems Adams targeted him mostly because he was friends with Thomas Jefferson.  Du Pont was not in the US at the time, but arrived in 1799.  Adams opted not to execute the warrant and Du Pont remained.

Another target was Constantin-François Chasseboeuf, comte de Volney.  The French philosopher had come in 1795, escaping the Reign of Terror.  Officials suspected him of spying and as part of a plot for France to re-acquire Louisiana.  Volney fled the country before the law took effect.

The third target was Médéric Louis Elie Moreau de St. Méry, a French refugee of the reign of terror who opened a bookstore in Philadelphia in 1794.  The bookstore became a meeting place for French exiles.  When asked why the President targeted him, Adams responded “Nothing in particular, but he’s too French.” St. Méry also packed up and returned to France before the government could act.

Alien Enemies Act

Congress also took up consideration of the Alien Enemies Act.  As I said, the Republicans had proposed this in hopes of heading off the Alien Friends Act, but the Federalists passed that first act, and then hoped to add to the government’s power with this second act.

The president would only be able to use this law if the US declared war or was invaded by another country.  It gave the president the power to apprehend, restrain, and remove any males over the age of 14 who were citizens or subjects of the enemy country and who were not naturalized US citizens.

It further gave federal courts the power to hold hearings and protect the due process rights of the aliens.  Because this was only a wartime measure, Republicans largely supported it.  Because Federalists got most of the powers they wanted in the Alien Friends Act, they were largely unconcerned with the restrictions in the Alien Enemies Act.  As a result, it passed both houses with little opposition.  President Adams signed it into law on July 6, 1798.

The Alien Enemies Act never went into effect during the Quasi-war because Congress never actually declared war.  Even so, the effect of passing the two alien acts and the new naturalization act sent the message to many immigrants that they were not welcome in America.  Hundreds left on their own.  The fact the Reign of Terror had ended in France gave many refugees confidence that they would be better off back in France.  Irish immigrants, knowing that things actually seemed to be getting worse in Ireland, Mostly took their chances and remained in America.

After taking care of their concerns of Aliens, Federalists next turned their attention toward American citizens whom they considered a danger.  

Next week: We will discuss the Sedition Act of 1798.

 - - -

Next  Episode 407 The Sedition Act of 1798 (coming soon)

Previous Episode 405 The Quasi-War Navy

 Contact me via email at mtroy.history@gmail.com

 Follow the podcast on X (formerly Twitter) @AmRevPodcast

 Join the Facebook group, American Revolution Podcast 

 Join American Revolution Podcast on Quora 
 
Discuss the AmRev Podcast on Reddit

American Revolution Podcast Merch!

T-shirts, hoodies, mugs, pillows, totes, notebooks, wall art, and more.  Get your favorite American Revolution logo today.  Help support this podcast.  https://merch.amrevpodcast.com


American Revolution Podcast is distributed 100% free of charge. If you can chip in to help defray my costs, I'd appreciate whatever you can give.  Make a one time donation through my PayPal account. You may also donate via Venmo (@Michael-Troy-20).


Click here to see my Patreon Page
You can support the American Revolution Podcast as a Patreon subscriber.  This is an option making monthly pledges.  Patreon support will give you access to ad-free episodes, podcast extras, and help make the podcast a sustainable project.



Signup for the AmRev Podcast Mail List

* indicates required

Further Reading

Websites

Immigrants and the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/essays/immigrants-and-alien-and-sedition-acts-1798

An Act Respecting Alien Enemies: https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/alien.asp

Alien and Sedition Actions (1798) https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/alien-and-sedition-acts

The Alien Enemies Act, Explained https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/alien-enemies-act-explained

Irish Rebellion of 1798 https://www.nam.ac.uk/explore/irish-rebellion-1798

Smith, James Morton. “The Enforcement of the Alien Friends Act of 1798.” The Mississippi Valley Historical Review, vol. 41, no. 1, 1954, pp. 85–104. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1898151

Free eBooks
(from archive.org unless noted)

Adams, Charles F. The Life of John Adams, Vol. 2, Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott & Co. 1871.

Bowers, Claude G. Jefferson and Hamilton: The Struggle for Democracy in America, London: Constable and Co. 1925.

Clark, Allen C. William Duane, Columbia Historical Society, 1905. 

Cobbett, James Detection of a Conspiracy Formed by the United Irishmen, London: J. Wright, 1799. 

Gribayédoff, Valerian. The French Invasion of Ireland in '98, New York: Charles P. Sumerby, 1890. 

Lawson, Elizabeth The Reign of Witches: The Struggle Against the Alien and Sedition Laws, New York: Civil Rights Congress, 1952. 

Madden, Richard R. The United Irishmen, London: The Catholic Publishing and Bookselling Co. 1860. 

Miller, John C. Crisis in Freedom: The Alien and Sedition Acts, Atlantic-Little Brown Books, 1951.  

Morse, Jr. John T. John Adams, Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Co. 1884. 

Wood, John The History of the Administration of John Adams, Esq., Late President of the United States, New York: Barlas and Ward, 1802. 

Books Worth Buying
(links to Amazon.com unless otherwise noted)*

Benner, David Compact of the Republic, Life & Liberty Publishing Group, 2014. 

Berkin, Carol A Sovereign People: The Crises of the 1790s and the Birth of American Nationalism, Basic Books, 2017. 

Brown, Ralph A. The Presidency of John Adams, Univ. of Kansas Press, 1975. 

Chernow, Ron Alexander Hamilton, Penguin Press, 2004. 

Chervinsky, Lindsay M. Making the Presidency John Adams and the Precedents That Forged the Republic, Oxford Univ. Press, 2024.

DeConde, Alexander The Quasi War: The Politics and Diplomacy of the Undeclared war with France, 1797-1801, Charles Scribner's Sons, 1966 (borrow on archive.org). 

Elkins, Stanley M. and Eric McKitrick, The Age of Federalism: The Early American Republic, 1788–1800, Oxford Univ. Press, 1993 (borrow on archive.org). 

Halperin, Terri D. The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798: Testing the Constitution, Johns Hopkins Univ. Press 2016 (borrow on archive.org). 

Kurtz, Stephen G. The Presidency of John Adams: The Collapse of Federalism, 1795-1800, Literary Licensing,  LLC, 2011.

Malone, Dumas Jefferson and the Ordeal of Liberty, Little Brown & Co. 1962 (borrow on archive.org).

McCullough, David John Adams, Simon & Schuster, 2001.  

Meacham, Jon Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power, Random House, 2012

Miller, John C. Alexander Hamilton and the Growth of the New Nation (or Portrait in Paradox), Harper & Brothers, 1959 (borrow on archive.org) 

Nester, William The Hamiltonian Vision, 1789-1800, Potomac Books, 2012.

O’Keefe, John M. Stranger Citizens: Migrant Influence and National Power in the Early American Republic, Cornell Univ. Press, 2021. 

Pakenham, Thomas. The Year of Liberty: The Great Irish Rebellion of 1798, Panther, 1972 (borrow on archive.org). 

Phalen, William J. The First War of United States: The Quasi War with France 1798-1801, Vij Books India, 2018.

Randall, Willard Sterne Thomas Jefferson: A Life, Henry Holt and Co. 1993.

Shaw Peter The Character of John Adams, Univ. of NC Press, 1976. 

Slack, Charles Liberty's First Crisis: Adams, Jefferson, and the Misfits Who Saved Free Speech, Grove Atlantic, Inc. 2015. 

Smith, Jean E. John Marshall: Definer of a Nation, Henry Holt & Co. 1996. 

Staloff, Darren Hamilton, Adams, Jefferson: The Politics of Enlightenment and the American Founding, Hill and Wang, 2005. 

Stinchcombe, William The XYZ Affair, Praeger, 1980. 

Vaughn, Harold C. The XYZ Affair, 1797-1798, Franklin Watts, 1972.

Wood, Gordon S. Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815, Oxford Univ. Press, 2009.

 * As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.



Sunday, November 1, 2026

ARP405 Quasi-War Navy

In our last episode, we covered Congress’ decision during the Quasi War to authorize a huge provisional army to prepare for an invasion by France.  Since that invasion never happened, the army turned out to be a big nothing.  The Navy, on the other hand, saw some actual service.  This week, we look at the new US Navy and some of its first wartime actions.

USS Constellation vs L'Insurgente
Congress eliminated the Continental Navy in 1785.  There was no money to sustain a navy.  The government had begun building a few frigates during the Washington Administration due to attacks on commercial shipping from North African states.  But those ships took years to build. 

After things began heating up with France, the government renewed efforts to complete the ships in 1797.  The USS United States was completed in May, the USS Constellation in September, and the USS Constitution in October.  Even though the ships themselves were complete, they were not equipped and did not have a crew.  That would take another year.  The USS United States was finally ready to set sail in May 1798, weeks after the XYZ affair became public.  The other two were ready by mid summer.

Also over the spring and summer of 1798, Congress authorized the conversion and arming of merchant ships for naval use.

Benjamin Stoddert

The looming war with France also focused Congress on the need for better administration of the new Navy.  Secretary of War James McHenry hand handled all of the work up until 1798.  James Barry, the famous Revolutionary War naval hero who was overseeing the building of the USS United States in Philadelphia, complained about McHenry’s incompetence and lack of attention to the navy.  He suggested that the government needed a separate Secretary of the Navy.

Congress held hearings, conferred with McHenry, and agreed with Barry’s assessment that the navy needed its own civilian leader.  In May 1798 as the XYZ affair was bringing on war fever, Congress authorized a Secretary of the Navy.  President Adams chose Benjamin Stoddert for the job.

At first glance, Stoddert seemed like an odd choice, and was actually the president’s second choice after former Senator George Cabot refused the offer.  Stoddert had served in the Continental Army during the Revolution as a cavalry officer.  He had served on the Continental Congress’ Board of War for a few years, which is probably where Secretary of State Pickering got to know him.  After the war, Stoddert founded a mercantile company operating out of Georgetown.  He also founded the Bank of Columbia in 1794.

Despite Stoddert’s lack of naval experience, Pickering recommended Stoddert because as a capable financial administrator.  He knew something about ship building and maintenance, and their related costs.  He was also a Federalist, which was important to the rest of the cabinet.  

Navy’s First Steps

Even before Stoddert took his new position as Secretary, Congress tried to step up naval operations.  It authorized the navy to seize armed French vessels off the coast.  It approved the purchase of twelve additional ships of up to 22 guns each to supplement the three frigates that were just about ready.

Several cities, acting on their own, began building warships for use in the conflict.  Congress authorized the President to accept these ships as loans for use in the war.

By the end of May 1798, the first ship, a converted merchant ship, the Ganges, departed Philadelphia for the first naval operation of the US Navy.  Its Captain, Richard Dale had served under John Paul Jones during the Revolution.

On July 7, Captain Stephen Decatur, Sr. with his son serving with him as an aide, scored the first naval victory of the war.  Decatur commanded the USS Delaware, a converted merchant ship.  His crew captured the French privateer La Croyable, off the coast of New Jersey.  They renamed the captured ship USS Retaliation.  A few months later, the French would recapture the Retaliation, but the US would take it a second time in 1799.

Also in July, 1798, Adams signed a new law authorizing American ships to go after armed French vessels anywhere, not just off the coast of the US.  He signed another act, formally establishing the US Marine Corps on July 11.  The following day, Adams granted William Ward Burrows a commission as a major and commandant of the new Marine Corps.  Burrows had minimal military experience, serving in the South Carolina militia during the Revolution.  He had come to Philadelphia to work as a lawyer after the Revolution.

By the time of his appointment, marines had already enlisted for service aboard ships.  The corps consisted of 881 officers and men.  Among Burrows’ rules was a ban on any black or mixed race Americans joining the marines.

Privateers, which had been so important during the Revolutionary War, did not play a role in the Quasi War.  The Administration never granted letters of marque to go after French merchant ships. The reason for this policy was that the Americans were going after the ships that were threatening American commerce, that is navy ships or French privateers.  French merchant ships offered no threat.  Unless the two countries actually went to war, the administration considered that off the table. 

Without approval to attack merchant ships, American privateers did not go to sea.  American merchant ships, however, were free to arm themselves.  Many of these armed merchants were able to fend off attacks from privateers or other smaller French vessels.

Early Deployments

France had been permitting French privateers to attack American shipping for some time.  It was one of the primary reasons why the Americans began this fight in the first place.  

As the Navy was expanding from simple coastal defense, Navy Secretary Stoddert ordered Commodore Barry to take a small fleet down to the West Indies to interdict French privateers.  

Barry took his 44 gun ship, the United States, along with the 20 gun Delaware, the 18 gun Herald, and the 14 gun Pickering to sail in the waters around Barbados, Martinique, Guadeloupe, and Antigua, in search of French privateers.  Barry also carried diplomatic letters for the Spanish Governor at San Juan, seeking the release of captured American sailors.

Barry left Philadelphia at the end of July with only the United States and the Delaware, as the other ships were having problems.  A few weeks later, the ships captured a French privateer in the Martinique passage.  A few weeks later, they captured a second ship near Puerto Rico.

But that was about it for Barry.  Less than two months after he left Philadelphia, he returned on September 21.  Barry complained that his ships had rotten provisions, a lack of ballast, and that he did not want to get caught in the hurricane season.  He never managed to deliver the letters to San Juan.

The Navy also spent a fair amount of time escorting merchant ships.  Captain Thomas Truxton commanded the 36 gun Constellation, assisted by the 20 gun Baltimore, in the fall of 1798, escorted American convoys from Havana back home. 

Also in late fall, the Montezuma, the Norfolk and the Retaliation patrolled around Antigua and Guadalupe.  When French frigates recaptured the Retaliation during this patrol, it would be the only American loss of a naval ship during the Quasi War.

Later Deployments

In December, after Barry had time to take care of the problems of his fleet.  After hurricane season had passed, he returned to the West Indies, tasked with defending American shipping and patrolling for French privateers.  He would operate out of Prince Rupert Bay on the island of Dominica.  At the time, the British controlled Dominica, but were happy to have a friendly naval force there focused on attacking their French enemies.

Barry was part of a much larger force.  Stoddert deployed pretty much the entire US fleet to the region, 21 ships divided into four squadrons.

Barry’s squadron at Dominica was joined by the George Washington, and the 44 gun Constitution, commanded by Samuel Nicholson, which arrived in January, 1799.  Another seven smaller ships rounded out Barry’s squadron at various times over the winter.

American patrols managed to capture or sink a couple more French privateers.  Stoddert, however, remained frustrated when Barry failed to police some of the most popular American shipping lanes.  Then, in April of 1799, after being there for less than four months, Barry simply packed up and returned the fleet to Philadelphia, citing his own health, the need to refit ships, and to deal with expiring twelve month crew enlistments.

Suddenly, American merchant ships in the West Indies found themselves without any American naval support again.  Stoddert had left his captains with ambiguous orders.  He had told Barry the mission would last until some time between April and June.  Although he tried to send orders extending that, those orders did not arrive before Barry started back to Philadelphia.

The Constellation also headed a squadron around St. Kitts, with four smaller ships. They arrived in January, patrolling the leeward Islands before they also returned home in May, also dealing with expiring enlistments.

Havana also hosted a winter fleet comprised of the 20 gun USS Delaware, with Captain Decatur commanding, along with the USS General Greene and the USS Governor Jay.  These ships arrived in December or January, remaining until May. 

Several other single ships patrolled different waters in the region, trying to deter attacks on American shipping anywhere. Over the spring and summer of 1799, most of the American ships returned home, leaving only five smaller ships in the region.

These patrols continued on and off through the rest of 1799, 1800, and into 1801. In late 1800, Stoddert tried to push Barry into a desk job, but Barry refused and returned to the West Indies, arriving in January 1801.  Since peace talks were almost complete by this time, Barry had orders to remain on the defensive and not go after ships that were not actively attacking American shipping.  By the spring of 1801, announcements of a cessation of hostilities allowed the ships to return home for good.

British Interactions

Much of the American success in the West Indies was thanks to British cooperation.  The British Navy still dominated the Atlantic Ocean, and kept most of France’s larger navy ships from leaving port in France.

British convoys also regularly permitted American merchant ships to join with their convoys for safe passage to Europe.  In early 1798, this was mostly an informal offer of convenience. By the end of 1798 the practice of British ships allowing Americans to join convoys was formalized and extended to voyages into the West Indies.  US Navy ships also reciprocated when they could, offering escorts to British merchant ships.

The two navies coordinated on signals so that each side could recognize friendly ships at sea, and avoid needless chases.  British ports were opened up to American merchant ships and even permitted the purchase of military supplies.

Britain, however, was not always entirely friendly.  British ships, always in need of more sailors, continued to impress Americans into British service.  In the fall of 1798 the 20 gun Baltimore, commanded by Captain Isaac Phillips was escorting nine merchant ships from Charleston to Havana.  

On November 16, they crossed paths with a British squadron led by Captain John Loring and the 74 gun Carnatic.  The British fired a shot across the bow and forced a halt to the convoy.  

Captain Phillips, who had rushed to sea without his formal commission, tried to convince Loring that he was an American naval officer.  He showed his orders from the Secretary of Navy.  Loring took one look and sneered saying “who is Ben Stoddert?”  He then informed Loring that he needed crew members and would seize any British subjects aboard the Baltimore.

Given the overwhelming size of the British ship, Philips submitted his muster.  The British removed 55 sailors, a little over one-third of the entire crew.  Later that day, they returned 50 of the men, keeping only 5.  When word of the incident reached Philadelphia, Adams summarily fired Captain Phillips for his submission to the British.  Adams then released instructions to all naval captains commanding that they never permit their vessel to be searched or have crew members taken.  If confronted by an overwhelming force, they were ordered to fight to the death.  They could strike colors if overpowered in battle, but never give up men without giving up the vessel.

The Administration also protested the incident with Britain.  The British admiralty, hoping to maintain the naval alliance against France, transferred Captain Loring to another station and gave assurances that this would not be repeated.

This assurance would not be followed.  In March of 1799 the HMS Surprise confronted the Ganges and demanded to examine the crew’s papers. Captain Tingey responded, "A public ship carries no protection but her flag. I do not expect to succeed in a contest with you, but I will die at my quarters before a man shall be taken from the ship."  The Ganges crew took battle stations.  Not wanting to create another incident, the British backed off.

While navy ships were left alone, American merchant vessels were not.  An estimated 3000 American merchantmen were serving under duress in the Royal Navy by 1800.

While the impressment issue remained a sore spot, British-US cooperation in protecting merchant ships against French predators remained pretty solid throughout the course of the conflict.  It was a matter of mutual self-interest. Both the US and Britain benefitted from the trade and from hurting France’s ability to interdict that trade.

The Battle of Nevis

The Americans never had enough really large ships at this time to engage in traditional European line battles, but there was one pretty significant battle off the coast of Nevis on February 1, 1799, involving Captain Thomas Truxton of the USS Constellation.

Truxton had been raised on Long Island and went to work as a merchant seaman in the 1760s.  When the Revolution began, a British ship impressed him and offered him a position as midshipman. While, of course, he had no choice but to serve aboard the ship, he refused the offer of a commission.  After being wounded during an action with an American privateer, he was able to get out of British service.  He took command of an American privateer, and captured several ships.  After the Revolution went back working on commercial shipping.

Truxton was one of the first captains that President George Washington tapped when the US began building its first frigates.  Like each of the captains, he oversaw his ship’s construction, selected its crew, and finally went to sea with the USS Constellation just as the Quasi-War began.

Truxton was cruising in the waters near Nevis when he came across the French frigate L’Insurgente, under the command of Captain Michel-Pierre Barreaut.  The two ships were pretty evenly matched.  The Constellation had 36 guns, compared to 40 on the L’Insurgente, but the Constellation’s guns were mostly larger and could throw more lead at the enemy. The French ship had just over 400 men vs a little over 300 on the Constellation. 

The Constellation was spoiling for a fight, while the L’Insurgente seemed to want to avoid one.  Captain Truxton approached the vessel, which was flying an American flag.  But the US Navy only had two other frigate class ships, and this one didn’t really look like either of them.  Truxton flashed British and American signals to get a response, but did not receive one.  Instead, the L’Insurgente took down the American flag, raised the French flag and fired a cannon.

Just as the fight was about to begin, a storm blew in.  The French captain tried to keep up his sails in the high wind to get away, but ended up bringing down his topmast instead.

As the Americans closed in, the French captain attempted to hail the enemy to avoid a fight, but the Constellation responded with a broadside.  The two ships continued to fire on each other.  Since the L’Insurgente had smaller cannons, it focused on trying to take out the Americans’ masts and rigging.  The Constellation used its 24 pounder cannons to rip holes in the sides of the enemy ship.

After a little over an hour, the L’Insurgente struck its colors and surrendered.  The damage was very one sided.  The French suffered 29 killed and 41 wounded.  The Americans lost two casualties.  One sailor lost a foot.  The only American sailor killed was killed by his own officer.  Lieutenant Andrew Sterett ran him through with his sword after the sailor attempted to abandon his gun during the battle.

Truxton put aboard a crew to take control of the L’Insurgente and began removing French prisoners to the Constellation.  Another storm separated the two ships before they could complete the process.  

Lieutenant John Rodgers found himself commanding the French ship with only twelve other American crewmen and 170 French prisoners aboard.  To prevent the French sailors from retaking the ship, he forced them into the ship’s lower holds and sailed with his skeleton crew to St. Kitts where it caught up with the Constellation.  The French ship was sold as a prize with the prize money distributed to the crew.  The US Navy bought the ship, repaired it, and christened it the USS Insurgent.

Captain Truxtun was celebrated as a military hero in both America and Britain.  London merchants sent him a silver plate to commemorate his victory.

By contrast, the French Captain Barreaut returned to France to face court martial.  He was acquitted.  Barreaut protested the capture of his ship, arguing that France and the US were not at war.  The French governor of Guadeloupe made the same demand for the same reason.  When a return was not forthcoming, the governor ordered the seizure of all American ships and property in the colony, and declared that a state of war existed between the United States and Guadeloupe.

The French outrage at one of their ships by hollow.  By this time, Captain Barreaut had already seized the USS Retaliation.  France had been attacking US shipping for years, yet they seemed really upset that the US had captured one of their frigates.

At the end of his report to Secretary of Navy Stoddert, Truxtun added. "The French captain tells me, I have caused a War with France, if so I am glad of it, for I detest Things being done by Halves".

The naval war would continue through 1801, but I want to cover some other war measures from 1798.  

Next week: Congress Passes the Alien Enemies Act of 1798

 - - -

Next Episode 406 The Alien Acts of 1798

Previous Episode 404 The Quasi-War Army

 Contact me via email at mtroy.
history@gmail.com

 Follow the podcast on X (formerly Twitter) @AmRevPodcast

 Join the Facebook group, American Revolution Podcast 

 Join American Revolution Podcast on Quora 
 
Discuss the AmRev Podcast on Reddit

American Revolution Podcast Merch!

T-shirts, hoodies, mugs, pillows, totes, notebooks, wall art, and more.  Get your favorite American Revolution logo today.  Help support this podcast.  https://merch.amrevpodcast.com


American Revolution Podcast is distributed 100% free of charge. If you can chip in to help defray my costs, I'd appreciate whatever you can give.  Make a one time donation through my PayPal account. You may also donate via Venmo (@Michael-Troy-20).


Click here to see my Patreon Page
You can support the American Revolution Podcast as a Patreon subscriber.  This is an option making monthly pledges.  Patreon support will give you access to ad-free episodes, podcast extras, and help make the podcast a sustainable project.



Signup for the AmRev Podcast Mail List

* indicates required

Further Reading

Websites

Quasi War https://www.mountvernon.org/library/digitalhistory/digital-encyclopedia/article/quasi-war

Benjamin Stoddert and the Quasi-War with France: https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval-history-magazine/1999/february/benjamin-stoddert-and-quasi-war-france

Sechrest, Larry J. “Privately Funded and Built U.S. Warships in the Quasi-War of 1797–1801.” The Independent Review, vol. 12, no. 1, 2007, pp. 101–13. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24562745

Commodore Thomas Truxtun, U. S. Navy https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/1932/april/commodore-thomas-truxtun-u-s-navy

Free eBooks
(from archive.org unless noted)

Adams, Charles F. The Life of John Adams, Vol. 2, Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott & Co. 1871.

Allen, Gardner Weld, Our Naval War with France, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1909. 

Brown, William L. An examination of the causes and conduct of the present war with France, London: T. Cabell, 1798. 

Morse, Jr. John T. John Adams, Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Co. 1884. 

Wood, John The History of the Administration of John Adams, Esq., Late President of the United States, New York: Barlas and Ward, 1802. 

Books Worth Buying
(links to Amazon.com unless otherwise noted)*

DeConde, Alexander The Quasi War: The Politics and Diplomacy of the Undeclared war with France, 1797-1801, Charles Scribner's Sons, 1966.

Elkins, Stanley M. and Eric McKitrick, The Age of Federalism: The Early American Republic, 1788–1800, Oxford Univ. Press, 1993 (borrow on archive.org). 

Kurtz, Stephen G. The Presidency of John Adams: The Collapse of Federalism, 1795-1800, Literary Licensing,  LLC, 2011.

Leiner, Frederick C. Millions for Defense: The Subscription Warships of 1798, Naval Institute Press, 1999. 

Maloney, Linda The Captain from Connecticut: The Life and Naval Times of Isaac Hull Boston: Northeastern Univ. Press, 1986.


Stinchcombe, William The XYZ Affair, Praeger, 1980. 

Vaughn, Harold C. The XYZ Affair, 1797-1798, Franklin Watts, 1972.

Wood, Gordon S. Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815, Oxford Univ. Press, 2009.

 * As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Sunday, October 25, 2026

AR-SP55 Joseph Warren, with Salina Baker

Our October, 2026 Round Table invited special guest, Salina Baker, author of the historical novel: Act Worthy of Yourselves: A Novel of Dr. Joseph Warren and an American Rebellion.  Ms. Baker join us to discuss the life of Joseph Warren.  Below is a summary of our discussion.


Origins, Ancestry, and Academic Foundations (1741–1760)

Joseph Warren was born in 1741 in Roxbury, Massachusetts, where he grew up on his family’s apple farm. His father was notable for cultivating the "Roxbury Russet" apple, a fruit variety that remains commercially available today. Warren’s father died when Joseph was very young, leaving his mother and family to manage the farm. His family sent him to the Roxbury Latin School to prepare for higher education.

In August 1755, at fourteen years old, Warren was admitted to Harvard College. He graduated in 1759 and subsequently taught at the Roxbury Latin School for a year while completing a master’s degree, which at the time required a year of independent self-study.


Medical Apprenticeship, Innovations, and Clinical Practice

Following his education at Harvard, Warren undertook a medical apprenticeship under Dr. James Lloyd, a wealthy and prominent Boston physician who had received advanced medical training overseas in London and Scotland. During the colonial era, holding a formal doctorate degree was not required to practice medicine; standard entry into the profession occurred through college coursework followed by a clinical apprenticeship under a recognized master practitioner.

Under Dr. Lloyd, Warren learned modern European medical practices, including obstetrics. Male participation in obstetrics and delivering babies was a novel and innovative medical development for the era, as childbirth was traditionally handled almost exclusively by female midwives. Dr. Lloyd also instructed Warren on the social conduct expected of a "gentleman physician".

Warren’s clinical practice in Boston spanned a diverse patient base:

  • Prominent Patriots: He served as personal physician to Patriot leaders, including Samuel Adams and John Hancock.
  • Loyalist Officials: He treated high-ranking Loyalist figures, including Lieutenant Governor Thomas Hutchinson, prior to the outbreak of hostilities.
  • Vulnerable & Poor Populations: Warren provided medical services at the Boston Alms House and treated patients across all socioeconomic strata, maintaining a core belief that every individual deserved proper medical care regardless of status or wealth.

Smallpox Inoculation and Medical Controversies

In 1764, Warren directed smallpox inoculation operations at Castle William. During this initiative, he inoculated John Adams and Adams’s brother. Smallpox inoculation was controversial during the 18th century due to social, religious, and safety concerns. While inoculation carried approximately a 2% mortality rate, contracting naturally occurring smallpox carried a death rate approaching 40%.

Warren also participated in professional medical debates. While he practiced bloodletting when clinically indicated, he opposed excessive or uncalibrated bleeding. He engaged in a public newspaper dispute with Dr. Thomas Young over Young’s decision to bleed a patient suffering from consumption (tuberculosis), arguing that Young had applied bloodletting inappropriately without following established medical protocols.


Entry into Political Resistance and Patriotic Leadership

Warren’s political involvement began during the 1765 Stamp Act crisis. He published his first political editorials in local newspapers under the pseudonym "BW," voicing opposition to Parliamentary taxation.

Secret Committees and Freemasonry

Warren joined underground Patriot networks, attending secret planning sessions held above Boston distilleries and the printing offices of the Boston Gazette alongside Samuel Adams and John Hancock.

He joined St. Andrew’s Masonic Lodge in Boston, establishing close ties with fellow Masons Paul Revere and John Hancock. Freemasonry provided a vital political and social support network for young Patriots opposing British colonial policy. Warren rose rapidly through the Masonic hierarchy, eventually being appointed Grand Master of All Masons in North America—a title he held at the time of his death.

Recruiting John Adams

Warren was instrumental in bringing John Adams fully into the Patriot movement. While Adams sympathized with resistance to Parliamentary authority, he hesitated to join formal radical groups like the Sons of Liberty due to the erratic behavior and paranoia displayed by early Patriot figure James Otis Jr.. Warren nudged and teased Adams until Adams agreed to take an active role in political organizing.

Boston Massacre Orations

Following the March 1770 Boston Massacre, the town of Boston instituted annual commemorative orations. Official town records show that Warren was specifically requested to deliver the annual address twice:

  1. March 1772: Delivered at a time when British troops had been withdrawn from Boston proper to Castle William.
  2. March 6, 1775: Delivered under extreme personal danger inside Boston, as armed British redcoats under General Thomas Gage attended the gathering to monitor speeches.

In addition to his own speeches, Warren collaborated with Samuel Adams to help write John Hancock’s Boston Massacre oration.


Civil Governance, the Suffolk Resolves, and Provincial Leadership

When British Parliament passed the Coercive Acts (Intolerable Acts) to punish Massachusetts for the Boston Tea Party, the Massachusetts Government Act curtailed traditional town meetings and replaced elected colonial councilors with crown appointees.

Authoring the Suffolk Resolves

In response, Warren authored the Suffolk Resolves, a document containing 19 resolutions laying out explicit colonial defiance against Parliament. The resolves recommended forming an independent provincial congress to bypass the invalidated colonial government.

President of the Massachusetts Provincial Congress

The Massachusetts Provincial Congress was established directly from the framework of the Suffolk Resolves. John Hancock initially served as its president; however, when Hancock departed for the Continental Congress in Philadelphia, Warren was elected President of the Massachusetts Provincial Congress in early May 1775.

Concurrently, Warren headed the Committee of Safety and the Committee of Correspondence, effectively assuming executive administrative leadership over the armed rebellion across Massachusetts.


Espionage Operations, Security Concerns, and Family Life

Warren managed Boston’s intelligence and surveillance network, acting as Paul Revere’s direct organizational supervisor.

The Midnight Ride of April 18–19, 1775

On the night of April 18, 1775, Warren received intelligence detailing British military movements aimed at Concord. He dispatched Paul Revere and William Dawes on their midnight ride to alert the countryside and warn Samuel Adams and John Hancock in Lexington.

Personal Life and Family Protection

Warren became a widower in April 1773 when his 26-year-old wife, Elizabeth, died of unknown causes, leaving him to care for four young children. His mother and brothers (Samuel and Ebenezer) continued to reside on the family apple farm in Roxbury.

Prior to April 19, 1775, fearing that General Gage’s forces might seize his motherless children in retaliatory arrests, Warren evacuated them to Worcester under the care of Mercy Scollay and a medical colleague. Despite these personal risks, Warren remained inside occupied Boston to coordinate intelligence operations until the outbreak of fighting at Lexington.


Military Operations and Pre-Bunker Hill Skirmishes

Warren had no formal military training prior to 1775, outside of participating in informal student militia drills at Harvard at age fifteen or sixteen. Nevertheless, he took an active role in combat operations following the outbreak of war:

  • Battle Road (April 19, 1775): Following the engagements at Lexington and Concord, Warren joined Brigadier General William Heath and local militia forces harassing retreating British troops through Menotomy. During the skirmish, a British musket ball struck his head, shooting away a decorative hair curl directly above his ear.
  • Siege of Boston Skirmishes: During the ongoing siege, Warren joined militia forces in tactical engagements, including the Battle of Chelsea Creek, operations on Hog Island, and a coastal skirmish at Weymouth to prevent British naval sloops from harvesting island hay.

Major General Commission

Recognizing his administrative leadership and organizing role, the Massachusetts Provincial Congress commissioned Warren as a Major General in the Massachusetts Provincial Army shortly before the Battle of Bunker Hill. He served alongside overall provincial army commander General Artemas Ward.


The Battle of Bunker Hill and Warren’s Death (June 17, 1775)

On the morning of June 17, 1775, Warren attended administrative meetings of the Provincial Congress in Watertown while suffering from a severe migraine headache. He returned to Cambridge in the afternoon to rest. Upon learning that British troops were landing on the Charlestown Peninsula, he walked to Breed's Hill accompanied by his medical apprentice, David Townsend.

Refusal of Command

When Warren arrived at the battlefield, both General Israel Putnam (stationed on Bunker Hill) and Colonel William Prescott (commanding the redoubt on Breed’s Hill) offered to relinquish overall command to him due to his rank as Major General. Warren refused command, stating that he came to fight purely as a volunteer private soldier because he lacked practical battlefield command experience.

Combat in the Redoubt and Fatal Wound

Warren entered the earthen redoubt on Breed’s Hill and fought alongside the militia during the first two British frontal assaults. On the third British assault, American troops exhausted their supply of gunpowder and were forced into hand-to-hand combat using musket stocks, swords, and rocks.

Warren took position as the last defender inside the redoubt to cover the retreat of the militia forces. As British troops swarmed the redoubt, Warren was shot in the face and killed instantly.


Posthumous Revelations and Political Context

Prior to his death, Warren wrote repeated letters to Samuel Adams at the Second Continental Congress in Philadelphia, pleading for Congress to adopt the Massachusetts Provincial Army and appoint a unified "generalissimo" to command all colonial forces. Warren maintained that the Massachusetts Provincial Congress lacked full civil legitimacy to run a multi-colony war effort.

Unknowing Sacrifice

On June 14, 1775—three days before Warren’s death—the Continental Congress officially created the Continental Army and appointed George Washington as Commander-in-Chief. Unaware of these events, Warren died at Bunker Hill believing the provincial army remained unadopted.

John Hancock, writing as President of the Continental Congress, dispatched an official letter to Warren informing him of Washington's appointment and asking Warren to receive Washington upon his arrival in Cambridge. The letter arrived after Warren had died.

Military Seniority and General Appointments

When Congress appointed the initial slate of Continental Army generals, Warren was not included. Appointments were allocated based on state quotas and prior military experience during the French and Indian War. Artemas Ward was appointed Major General, while senior Massachusetts militia officers John Thomas and Seth Pomeroy received Brigadier General commissions. (Pomeroy declined his commission, while Thomas subsequently died of smallpox during the Quebec campaign).


Subsequent Relocations of Physical Remains and Memorials

Following the battle, British forces buried Warren in an unmarked mass grave on Breed's Hill. The odyssey of his physical remains unfolded over the next century:

  1. First Recovery (April 1776): Following the British evacuation of Boston, Warren’s brothers located his grave on April 5, 1776. Paul Revere positively identified the remains using an artificial dental bridge he had crafted for Warren, combined with the distinct bullet entry wound through the skull.
  2. State Funeral and Granary Burying Ground: Warren’s remains lay in state at the Massachusetts State House for three days. On April 8, 1776, a formal funeral featuring Masonic rites was held at King’s Chapel. Because the Warren family did not own a private plot in Boston, he was interred in a friend's tomb at the Granary Burying Ground.
  3. Second Relocation (1825): Fifty years later, in 1825, Warren’s nephew, Dr. John Collins Warren, located his uncle's remains at the Granary Burying Ground. The remains were re-verified using Revere's dental work and transferred to St. Paul’s Church in Boston, where they rested for thirty years.
  4. Final Interments (1855 & 2016): In 1855, Dr. John Collins Warren purchased a family burial plot at Forest Hills Cemetery in Jamaica Plain, moving Warren’s remains to their permanent resting place. In 2016, the Grand Lodge of Masons erected a memorial statue over his grave.

Round Table Audience Q&A

During the audience Q&A segment, Selena Baker and host addressed specific historical inquiries:

  • Why General Gage Did Not Arrest Warren: Audience member Bob asked why General Gage refrained from arresting Warren prior to April 1775 despite Warren's known role in organizing resistance. Baker and Troy explained that Gage feared arresting high-profile Patriot leaders would trigger a popular armed uprising. In an earlier instance in Salem, when Gage attempted to enforce town meeting bans, over 2,000 armed militiamen gathered at the local jail, forcing authorities to back down. Gage consequently avoided arresting political figures, focusing military operations strictly on seizing military stores and armaments.
  • Medical Practices and Bloodletting: In response to a medical question regarding whether Warren practiced bloodletting similarly to Dr. Benjamin Rush, Baker confirmed Warren utilized bloodletting but far less aggressively than Rush. She reiterated his public feud with Dr. Thomas Young over inappropriate bloodletting treatments.
  • Masonic Burial Rites: Baker confirmed that while Warren was not initially buried in a Masonic apron in 1775, the April 1776 reinterment ceremony included formal Masonic processions, regalia, and a eulogy delivered by a fellow Mason at King's Chapel.
  • Distinction Between Joseph Warren and James Warren:  Major General James Warren—who succeeded Joseph Warren as President of the Massachusetts Provincial Congress and was married to author Mercy Otis Warren—was not closely related to Dr. Joseph Warren

* * *  



⁠Author Website: https://www.salinabbaker.com

To see upcoming roundtable events, or listen to past recordings, go to ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://amrevrt.org/virtual-round-table-events⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

To participate live in future Zoom events, be sure to join as a member on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Patreon⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, or sign up for my ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠mailing list⁠⁠⁠⁠.

Click here to see my Patreon Page
You can support the American Revolution Podcast as a Patreon subscriber.  This is an option making monthly pledges.  Patreon support will give you access to Podcast extras and help make the podcast a sustainable project.


Signup for the AmRev Podcast Mail List

* indicates required