Sunday, November 15, 2020

ARP175 Von Steuben at Valley Forge

For the last couple of weeks we covered events in France and Britain and the US signed its first foreign treaty and Britain declared war on France.

Before that, we left the Continental Army cold, hungry, and slowly falling apart in Valley Forge.  

Baron von Steuben

In February of 1778, a Prussian officer made his way to Valley Forge, Pennsylvania.  I mentioned Friedrich Wilhelm Augustus von Steuben back in Episode 136, when he met with Benjamin Franklin in Paris seeking a commission.  

Baron von Steuben
(from Wikimedia)
The 47 year old Von Steuben had served as an officer in the Prussian army as a young man.  He spent much of his early years in Russia, as his father had served as a lieutenant in the Russian war against the Turks.  By age 14, he was serving with his father in the War of Austrian Succession.  By age 17, he had his own commission in the Prussian Army and served in the Seven Years War.

Records of his service in the Seven Years War are sketchy, but he was wounded in two different battles during the war, and served as an adjutant for a couple of generals.  By the end of the war, the up and coming young officer had risen to the rank of captain, and was serving as an aide-de-camp on the staff of Frederick the Great.  When the war came to an end in 1763 though, so did von Steuben’s military career.  The size of the army shrank dramatically. Some officers remained in the peacetime army, but von Steuben did not make the cut.  

After leaving the army, Steuben got himself a position as a Hofmarschall (or what the British call a chamberlain) for a minor German prince.  In this role, he would be responsible for arranging events, trips, and supervising the household staff.  It could be a pretty good job with the right house.  Unfortunately, the prince who hired him was broke.  Steuben accompanied the family to France, where they tried to live rather simply while trying to raise cash.  In 1771 the prince bestowed the title of “baron” on his loyal assistant,

Despite their efforts, the prince, and von Steuben, remained broke.  By 1775 Steuben was looking to commission in any army that would take him.  He applied to the British, French, and Austrian armies, all with no luck.  There is some speculation that rumors of his homosexuality may have prevented his appointment.  There was no solid evidence to prove this, but there were apparently rumors of such activity circulating in Europe.

In 1777, Steuben got word that the Americans were looking for officers and went to see Benjamin Franklin.  By this time, the American Commissioners in Paris had already gotten pushback from Congress about the commissions that they had already offered.  So they would not send him with a pre-approved commission.  Instead, Franklin sent von Steuben to America with a letter recommending a commission and saying he had been a lieutenant general under Frederick the Great.  This mistake was later attributed to a translation error since he had never held a rank above captain.  Others argued that Franklin deliberately puffed up the resume of an officer that he liked.  Even so, Prussia had a reputation for one of the best trained armies in the world.  Franklin believed the Continentals badly needed von Steuben’s experience.

Arrival in America

Von Steuben’s ship reached Portsmouth, New Hampshire on December 1, 1777.  After spending ten days there, his party made its way to Boston.  There, he got a hero’s welcome, meeting with John Hancock and Samuel Adams.  What he did not get though, was any money.  He had arrived in America on some borrowed funds and had to cover his living expenses, and those of his small staff, as he awaited word from Congress about a commission.  While in Boston, he met several French officers whom Congress had rejected, and who were trying to find a way back to France.  At that point, Von Steuben began to worry that he had made a terrible mistake in coming.

Undeterred, he set out for York, Pennsylvania in mid-January,  hoping to make his case directly to Congress.  As it turned out, Congress had received word of his arrival and was interested in his services.  Even so, von Steuben found himself navigating the politics of the ongoing Conway Cabal (see Episode 171) as the head of the Board of War, Horatio Gates, and the Commander-in-Chief, George Washington, were barely on speaking terms.  Von Steuben met with Gates to assure him that he would not become a Washington partisan.  

 General von Steuben
(from Rev. War Journal)
There was also the issue of Continental soldiers resenting foreign adventurers getting commissions over them, as well as the Continental Congress not having any money.  Von Steuben agreed to serve as a gentleman volunteer, not taking a rank or salary in the army, at least until he had proven himself.  He only sought to have Congress cover his expenses.  Instead, he offered to work on commission asking that if, after Congress won the war and believed that he had contributed, that he be paid 600 guineas per year for his service, plus interest.  A guinea was gold and at the time was worth just a little more than a British pound sterling.  Congress always liked the idea of paying later, and accepted the offer.

Congress generally welcomed von Steuben and found his agreeable flexibility on rank and pay rather pleasant. Von Steuben’s view of Congress was a little different.  Most of the delegates had gone home for the winter by the time he arrived in York.  There were less than two dozen delegates still in York, and they were mostly the “B Team”.  Many of the more prominent delegates were not happy with York accommodations.  Not expecting much to happen over the winter, many found it a good time to take leave and go home.  That said, Congress was still in operation and trying to keep everything running.

As part of the negotiations, von Steuben requested that two French officers that had been denied commissions and whom he had met in Boston on their way home, be granted commissions as his aides.  Congress agreed and granted commissions to François-Adrien de Romanet and an engineer named Pierre Charles L'Enfant.  The latter might be a recognizable name to some of you as he went on to design the new federal city at Washington after the war.

Although von Steuben did not demand a formal commission, Congress gave him one anyway: that of captain.  Von Steuben saw this as worse than no rank at all since it was far below what he was seeking.  Even one of his aides received a commission as major.  Congress, however, believed it important that he have some nominal commission in case the British captured him.  They wanted to ensure he would receive the courtesy given to other imprisoned officers.

With that, Steuben had the support of the Board of War under Horatio Gates, and the tentative support of the Continental Congress.  But all of this seemed to be a probationary trial.  Everyone wanted to see what this man could do before they were willing to bestow rank and money on this unknown quantity.

Valley Forge

By the end of February, von Steuben left York for Valley Forge.  General Washington met Steuben on the road with an honor guard to escort him into camp.  Washington was pleased to have the new officer who very much looked the role of a European general.  He wore his Prussian uniform with ribbons and medals on display.  He was a large barrel-chested man whose physical presence exuded leadership.  Washington also was impeccably dressed and also impressed European visitors with his appearance as a commanding officer.

However, von Steuben described his first encounter with Washington as rather awkward.  Washington did not greet him as a friend, nor did he show any deference to him.  Steuben took this as getting a bit of a cold shoulder.  In fact, it was Washington’s personality to greet virtually anyone with a formal reserve.  The fact that Washington’s rival, Horatio Gates, had sent von Steuben to him at least caused Washington to be a little wary of the new officer.  Again, Steuben would have to prove himself.

On visiting Valley Forge, von Steuben had to wonder what he had gotten himself into.  He saw men in camp naked and starving, on the verge of mutiny.  It may have looked more like a refugee camp than an army. Desertions were on the increase.  The main thing keeping many in camp was that they were too weak from hunger and cold to go anywhere.  On top of that, the top military and political leadership was divided into Team Washington and Team Gates with no real certainty that they would and could work together.

Von Steuben became the informal Inspector General for the army.  It had to be informal because General Thomas Conway still held that role.  After Washington had really given Conway the cold shoulder and refused to work with him unless explicitly ordered to do so, Congress had shipped off Conway to Peekskill.  

Even so, Conway retained his rank and position.  Until Conway resigned, or Congress terminated him, von Steuben could not become the inspector general.  That said, he took on the role and duties of inspector general, with plans to add more military discipline to the camp, and to train the soldiers in the practice of formal military field drills.

Training (from Rev. War Journal)
Despite the challenges, von Steuben was optimistic and excited to begin his new role.  He had been warned that all the officers were living in crude huts, but on his arrival he received as his quarters a nice stone house recently vacated by General de Kalb.  Von Steuben was limited in his ability to get to know his fellow officers by the fact that he did not speak English.  He did speak French pretty well.  The President of Congress Henry Laurens, had advised von Steuben to seek out his son, John Laurens, who was serving as Washington’s aide-de-camp.  Laurens spoke French and, having spent years in Europe, was hungry for good conversations with men of education and breeding.  

Laurens, and his fellow aide-de-camp Alexander Hamilton, found themselves spending a great deal of time with von Steuben.  Their positive view of this new officer helped von Steuben’s standing with Washington, who trusted the judgment of his aides.  The relationship also helped his standing with Congress since John Laurens’ ongoing letters to his father helped assure the President of Congress that von Steuben would be a real asset to the army.

General Washington gave von Steuben free range of the camp and had him as a dinner guest on most nights for the first two weeks of his stay.  Von Steuben took careful notes and eventually reported his findings to Washington.  His final report was a rather blunt assessment of improper camp layout, unfinished defenses, and an ill-equipped and poorly-trained army.

Washington did not give much of any response to Von Steuben’s report, nor did he pass it along to Congress.  Some took this as concern that Washington was offended by the blunt assessment.  That, however, does not appear to be the case.  Washington was still looking for the best way to use this new asset.

Some in Congress wanted von Steuben to become the new Quartermaster General after General Thomas Mifflin had left the position.  He had served in that role in the Prussian Army.  However, the American Quartermaster would have to work with many civilians and merchants for the purchase of food and supplies.  A German-speaking officer without any experience in American mercantilism might not be the best choice.  Instead, Washington put him to work drilling the soldiers.  In March he became acting Inspector General.

Model Company

The role of drill master brought with it its own hurdles.  First, many of the soldiers were too sick, too ill-fed, or lacked clothing to march outside.  Von Steuben requested that the army give him a special company of 100 men, drawn from across all the regiments, who were sufficiently fit to drill.  He also took on 50 men from Washington’s elite Life Guards as part of his first group of trainees.  The goal was that von Steuben would train these men in basic drill, and that they would, in turn, go back to their regiments and train the others.

Steuben drills troops at Valley Forge
(from Wikimedia)
Even the 150 man group he began with was too much.  Von Steuben selected twenty of those men to drill while the others watched.  They started with the very basics, how to stand at attention and march in step.  Although Prussians have a reputation for strictness and a lack of a a sense of humor, von Steuben quickly adjusted this demeanor to laugh with the men as they screwed up, while gently correcting the smallest error to detail.

Even with just the small group, von Steuben had his problems.  One of the big ones was that he still could not speak English.  He had to give his commands in French, to an officer who would then translate into English.  The training was slow going at first, von Steuben would curse and shout when the inexperienced company screwed up a command.  There is a fun story of von Steuben calling over his translator and telling him to swear at the men in English for him.

Over the next few weeks, von Steuben learned the English swear words himself, but the model company also got better at the drill.  Von Steuben also quickly gained a favorable reputation.  He was one of the few officers in the American leadership who would regularly interact with the ranks and let them complain to him.  He also held parties at his house for junior officers.  According to one story, he said no one could come into the party who had a fully intact pair of pants.  This was in response to the fact that many men had tattered clothes that were literally falling off their bodies.  He wanted those who were suffering most from this deprivation not to feel ashamed about coming to his home for entertainment.  

The group quickly became known as the sans-culottes which in French means “without breeches.”  This is not to be confused with the radical group of the same name during the French Revolution.  That group took its name from the fact that its radical members chose to wear more modern trousers rather than the old fashioned knee breeches.  In von Steuben’s case, the men had no pants at all.  Given that von Steuben was also believed to have been a homosexual, there may have been other reasons why he enjoyed having young men hanging out in his home without pants.

During the drill, many officers and men from other regiments wandered over to watch the training.  Camp life was dull, and the men enjoyed watching Steuben scream and rant when the men screwed up a drill.  He found that the source of amusement worked for him and began exaggerating his temper tantrums.

Von Steuben focused on march and moving in lines rather than on firing their guns.  He wanted the men to look and feel like an army when marching onto a field.  The men already knew how to fire a gun, and doing that in precise steps was not as important.

Von Steuben did not have a training manual for the Continental Army.  He would later write the manual, which would be used until the end of the War of 1812.  But for now, he was using the memory of his old Prussian military drill and adapting it on the fly, as he saw fit.  Von Steuben also quickly realized that the American character would not accept an overbearing officer.  After the war, he wrote to a European colleague, commenting that, unlike a European soldier where you simply told them to do this or than and they obeyed, in America, you had to explain why it was important to do this or that, and then they obeyed.

Von Steuben’s training began in late March 1778.  After only a few days, General Washington saw the progress.  He ordered his regimental commanders to cease any training until they had received experience with von Steuben’s methods.  He also called on nominations from his officers for an Inspector General, ignoring the fact that General Conway in Peekskill still held that office as established by Congress.  A week later, Washington began referring to von Steuben as the Inspector General.  The model company began spreading the training throughout the regiments.  By mid-April, much of the army had received at least some training in the new drills.  

General von Steuben

Not only was General Washington impressed with Steuben’s results, the entire army seemed to fall in love with the new drillmaster.  He became highly popular with the officers and men, despite the language barrier between most of them.  

In late April, when Congress accepted General Conway’s offer to resign, Washington immediately wrote Congress requesting that von Steuben not only be given the position of Inspector General, but that he also be commissioned as a major general, with the full pay accorded to that rank.  Within days, Congress approved both of those recommendations..

Washington, however, did not inform Steuben immediately.  On May 1, Valley Forge received the news that France has signed the treaty of alliance.  The army celebrated that soon France would give them the much needed supplies, money, and armies they needed to defeat the British once and for all.  Washington called for a grand review of the army on May 6, to celebrate the French alliance and give Steuben an opportunity to show what the men could perform.  

The review went off well. Afterwards, the officers had a celebratory party and offered toasts all around.  Washington used the opportunity to inform von Steuben that he was now Major General von Steuben and that he was officially the Continental Army’s Inspector General.  The new general would have a full staff of aides and assistant inspector generals.  The Continental Army put its faith in him as a leader.

Next week, we are going to step away from Valley Forge again to hear about the Continental Navy and the sinking of the Randolph.

- - -

Next Episode 176 Sinking the Randolph 



Contact me via email at mtroy.history@gmail.com

Follow the podcast on Twitter @AmRevPodcast

Join the Facebook group, American Revolution Podcast: https://www.facebook.com/groups/132651894048271

Click here to donate
American Revolution Podcast is distributed 100% free of charge. If you can chip in to help defray my costs, I'd appreciate whatever you can give.  Make a one time donation through my PayPal account.

You may also donate via VenmoZelle, or popmoney (send to mtroy1@yahoo.com)


Click here to see my Patreon Page
You can support the American Revolution Podcast as a Patreon subscriber.  This is an option for people who want to make monthly pledges.  Patreon support will give you access to Podcast extras and help make the podcast a sustainable project.



An alternative to Patreon is SubscribeStar.  For anyone who has problems with Patreon, you can get the same benefits by subscribing at SubscribeStar.

Click here to go to my SubscribeStar Page


Visit the American Revolution Podcast Bookshop.  Support local bookstores and this podcast!






Signup for our Mail List

* indicates required

Further Reading

Websites

Armstrong, O.K. “He Transformed a Rabble Into an Army.” Prairie Schooner, vol. 21, no. 4, 1947, pp. 380–385. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/40623911

Danckert, Stephen C. “A Genius for Training Baron Von Steuben and the Training of the Continental Army.” Army History, no. 17, 1990, pp. 7–10. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/26302910

Fleming, Thomas “The Magnificent Fraud: How a lying poseur from Prussia gave America its army” American Heritage Magazine, Vol. 57, Issue, 1, Feb/Mar 2006. https://www.americanheritage.com/magnificent-fraud

Schellhammer, Michael “The Impact of General von Steuben” Journal of the American Revolution, May 23, 2013: https://allthingsliberty.com/2013/05/impact-of-von-steuben

“From Benjamin Franklin to George Washington, 4 September 1777,” Founders Online, National Archives, https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Franklin/01-24-02-0389

“To George Washington from Steuben, 6 December 1777,” Founders Online, National Archives, https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/03-12-02-0519

Free eBooks
(from archive.org unless noted)

Doyle, Joseph Beatty Frederick William von Steuben and the American Revolution, Steubenville, Ohio: The H.C. Cookhttps://allthingsliberty.com/2013/05/impact-of-von-steubenCo. 1913. 

Greene, George Washington The German Element in the War of American Independence, New York: Hurd & Houghton, 1876.

Kapp, Friedrich The Life of Frederick William von Steuben,  New York: Mason, 1859.

Prowell, George R. Continental Congress at York, Pennsylvania and York County in the Revolution, The York Printing Co., 1914.

Steuben, Friedrich Regulations for the order and discipline of the troops of the United States : to which is added, an appendix, containing the United States militia act, passed in Congress, May, 1792 ; and the act for forming and regulating the militia in New-Hampshire, Exeter, N.H.: Henry Ranlet, 1794 

Woodman, Henry The History of Valley Forge, Oaks, Pa., J. U. Francis, 1922.

Books Worth Buying
(links to Amazon.com unless otherwise noted)*

Buchanan, John The Road to Valley Forge: How Washington Built the Army that Won the Revolution, Wiley, 2004.

Chidsey, Donald Barr Valley Forge; An On-The-scene Account of the Winter Crisis in the Revolutionary War, Crown Publishing, 1959.

Drury, Bob & Clavin, Tom Valley Forge, Simon & Schuster, 2018.

Fleming, Thomas Washington's Secret War: The Hidden History of Valley Forge, Smithsonian, 2005.

Flexner, James Thomas, George Washington in the American Revolution, 1775-1783, Little Brown, 1968.

Lockhart, Paul The Drillmaster of Valley Forge: The Baron de Steuben and the Making of the American Army, Smithsonian, 2008.

Von Steuben, Friedrich Wilhelm Regulations for the Order and Discipline of the Troops of the United States, Applewood Press, 2019 (reprint of original drill manual).

 Ward, Christopher The War of the Revolution, Macmillan, 1952. 

* As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Sunday, November 8, 2020

ARP174 Britain and France go to War


The winter of 1777-1778 was a difficult turning point for the ministry in London. Circumstances required a radical change in the conduct of the war.

Burgoyne’s Surrender

News of General Burgoyne’s surrender shocked officials, who never seriously considered such a possibility.  Many had figured the worst case would have been for Burgoyne’s army to retreat back to Fort Ticonderoga for another try the following year.

Lord North
(from Wikimedia)
Even before word of the surrender reached London, officials were skeptical of an easy way out of the American quagmire.  In August, Prime Minister Lord North wrote to one of his undersecretaries of state that, “it has been for many months been clear to me that if we cannot reduce the Colonies by force now employed under Howe and Clinton and Burgoyne, we cannot send and support a force capable to reduce them.”  

The British army in America in 1777 was larger than the entire British Army around the world had been before the war began.  Normally Britain kept between 12,000 and 15,000 soldiers in Ireland in order to discourage revolts there.  Because of the war in America, they had reduced the garrisons to around 3000.  In 1776, after one of two regiments in Jamaica sailed for New York to support General Howe, officials had to put down a planned slave insurrection that got its motivation from the reduction in military on the island.

Much of the British empire remained in peaceful obedience because subjects believed that defiance would not lead to victory, but only to a brutal suppression.  With Britain removing so many soldiers from other outposts around the world to support the suppression of the American rebellion, Britain was putting its other colonies at risk.

Howe’s calls for more soldiers for America would only make the situation even more precarious in other parts of the empire.  Britain had already sent the largest transatlantic military force ever deployed up until that time to America in 1776.  The point of that was to shock and awe the colonists into submission.  More than a year later, the Americans seemed neither shocked nor awed.  Their armies continued to defy authority and their claim for independence did not seem to falter. 

King George III
(from Wikimedia)

North, and others, believed that if they could not crush the American rebellion with that large force sent in 1776, then Britain could not crush the rebellion at all.  In another letter preparing for the King's speech to Parliament to be presented in the fall of 1777, Lord North wrote “How shall we mention America? Shall we be very stout? Or shall we take advantage of the flourishing state of our affairs to get out of this d--d war, and hold a moderate language?”  In other words, even before the loss at Saratoga, North was seriously debating the idea of an exit strategy.

If there was one stalwart leader in London who was not looking for a way to resolve the war other than victory, it was King George III.  On November 20, 1777, the King made his speech to the new session of Parliament.  The sole focus of his speech was the rebellion in America and the need to restore peace, order, and loyalty to his American colonies.

When rumors of Burgoyne’s surrender reached London a week or so later, and were confirmed by early December, the landscape of the war changed dramatically.  This was the first time in history an entire British army had surrendered and been taken prisoner.  It made very clear that crushing the American rebellion was not inevitable, that the plans to do so had failed thus far, and that there were no good plans for turning things around.

It was in early December that Lord North sent Paul Wentworth to Paris to talk to the American commissioners about a negotiated peace, something I pointed out last week.  The Commissioners only used those discussions to get France to move along its negotiating a treaty of alliance with the US.

Howe’s Resignation

About the same time that London was getting word of Burgoyne’s surrender, it also received General Howe’s resignation letter.  Back in mid-October, even before he received word of Burgoyne’s surrender, General William Howe wrote to Lord George Germain in London to express his wish to resign his command and return to London.  Howe believed that Germain and other officials in London had refused to take his advice on strategy and that they refused to provide him with the soldiers he needed to carry out any effective operations.

Gen. William Howe
(from Wikimedia)
It is hard to say for certain if Howe genuinely wanted to resign, whether he was bluffing in hopes it would get the ministry to give him the reinforcements and command authority that he thought he needed to win, or more likely somewhere in between.  Howe said he did not think he could win without more reinforcements.  If he was not going to get them, he did not see a path to victory.  London could either supply the troops or pick a new leader who thought he could do better.

Secretary of State Lord Germain had already made clear that he was not going to raise more armies in any substantial numbers beyond those sent in 1776.  With the loss of an army of over 8000 in the Saratoga campaign, the British Army would have an even smaller force to work with going forward.

By this time most of Parliament was laying the blame for this debacle on Germain.  He was the man responsible for authorizing the Burgoyne campaign, and for making sure that Burgoyne received the necessary support to complete his mission, including making sure that General Howe’s army would work with Burgoyne as originally planned.  Germain had allowed General Howe to sail off in his attempt to capture Philadelphia.  While the Philadelphia campaign was successful, it also meant that Howe was unavailable to assist Burgoyne.  Many officials in London believed this support could have prevented Burgoyne’s surrender.

Howe’s letter of resignation made it easier to try to make him the fall guy for this whole mess.  Germain insisted that General Howe had failed to support Burgoyne as planned and that Howe should take responsibility for his decision to sail off for Philadelphia.  Officials also laid blame on General Howe’s brother, Admiral Richard Howe, for the navy’s failure to control the coast and deal with smugglers and privateers that supported the rebellion.  They argued the admiral spent too much time helping his brother in support of the army.  By early January, the ministry also had a request from Admiral Howe, that he be relieved of his command in North America.

Lord George Germain
(from Wikimedia)
Lord Germain, who never really liked the Howes, was all for replacing them.  In early January, he was pushing for Sir Jeffrey Amherst to take command.  The sixty year old general had brought victory in America in the French and Indian War.  He was highly respected and was a higher ranking general than Howe.  In fact, Amherst had been Germain’s preference before the ministry selected William Howe.  The reason Amherst did not get the job in 1776 was that he did not want it.  Amherst did not want to put down the rebellion in 1776, and he certainly did not want to get handed this mess in 1778.  It is hard though, to say no if the King requests that you take the command.  Therefore, Amherst had to make clear to the Ministry that he was not on board with their plan.  Amherst insisted that he would need an army of at least 75,000 in America, more than double the current troop levels.  Without that, Amherst believed there was no chance of success.  Since the Ministry was not willing to build and deploy such a large army to America, they ended up passing on Amherst.

Even if Germain wanted them gone, the Howe brothers had many powerful and influential supporters in London.  The King was not ready to accept Howe’s resignation and lay the blame there.  The King also did not want to get rid of Lord Germain, or Lord North, both of whom were implementing the policies he wanted.  The King did not think he had any alternatives who would prosecute the war more forcefully.  As a result, the ministry made no personnel changes as they argued through January 1778 about what they should do next.

By the end of January, it was clear that either Lord Germain or General Howe had to take the blame for the mess in America.  The King told Lord North to decide which of them should go.  North opted to keep Germain.  This decision, as expected, created a political firestorm.  The Chancellor, Lord Bathurst, threatened to resign in protest.  Bathurst was a childhood friend of the Howe brothers, and was possibly even a distant relation.  He clearly was in the Howe camp and was not ready to accept North’s decision to remove them.

To keep the Cabinet from falling apart, the King ordered Germain to write a letter to Howe which was vague in its purpose.  Germain’s letter said that Howe was to come back to London for consultations, but that the King remained confident that General Howe could win the war, and instructed him to prepare a series of attacks on New England ports for the coming year.

In the meantime, since all the military commanders seemed to think that winning would require more soldiers than the government could afford to produce, the ministry began looking at other strategies that would not require holding large swaths of land in America.  Before they had approved the 1776 shock and awe campaign led by the Howe Brothers, many had pushed for a more naval centric operation where the British Navy would maintain a blockade of the continent, performing only coastal raids.  The hope was that the misery of no trade would eventually result in popular opposition in American to the patriot cause and lead to a negotiated peace.  The ministry was again considering this approach.

As January turned into February and the Ministry waited to see if France would actually sign a treaty with the US and go to war with Britain, the King even suggested that they abandon New York and Philadelphia.  They would retain garrisons only in Quebec, Nova Scotia, and the Floridas. From there, they would simply maintain a naval blockade with no army presence within the rebellious colonies.

War with France

British spies reported on the treaty negotiations at Versailles.  London had numerous spies on the staff of the American negotiators, so London received reports of all progress almost as soon as it happened.  Lord North had complete copies of the secret treaties that France had signed with the US within days of their completion on February 6.  The only question for London was whether France would keep the treaties secret for an extended time, or announce them quickly.  

London thought the treaties might stay a secret for months, thus averting open war between Britain and France.  This would give London a short window to concentrate its forces in America on one final push to focus on suppressing the American rebellion.

Once France declared war, or publicly released word of the treaty, which would require Britain to declare war, Britain would have redeploy much of its army and navy to protect other colonies and even prepare to defend against a French invasion of Britain itself.  Britain would no longer be fighting to win.  Rather, they would be fighting to limit the potential damage to their empire.

Earl of Sandwich
(from Wikimedia)
The First Lord of the Admiralty, Lord Sandwich had been pushing for a naval-centric war for some time.  And yes, he is the guy for whom we named the food between two pieces of bread.  Sandwich had been with the Admiralty for decades.  He saw how the navy had successfully controlled the Atlantic in the Seven Years War, making the British victory possible.  

In the Seven Years War, begun nearly two decades earlier, France had to focus much of its forces in Europe to fight with Prussia and the other German states.  In this war, France would be able to focus its much larger army on Britain alone.  France had also spent several years building a much larger navy, with warships prepared to contest Britain for colonies and to transport its armies wherever needed.  Britain would not only need much of its army to defend the mother country, but would also need to recall some of its fleet to protect the island against a potential French invasion.

On March 8, London issued orders to the commander in America that he should abandon offensive operations if he could not bring the Continental Army to an immediate decisive action.  Instead, war planners in London would have the navy would spend much of the 1778 fighting season attacking the New England coast.  In the fall, they would recapture Georgia, the Carolinas, and possibly Virginia, thus establishing royal control of the southern colonies, where they thought there was a much larger Tory population that would support the King’s troops.  This would allow the navy to focus its blockade on New England and starve out the inhabitants.

On March 13, less than a week after sending those orders to America, France publicly announced its treaty with America and informed King George III.  Four days later, on March 17, Britain declared war on France.

Clinton Named New Commander

By this time, the decision to replace the military commander in America was more than a month old.  In early February, Germain had dispatched a letter to General Howe accepting his offer to resign his command and recalling him to London.  At the same time, he sent a letter to General Henry Clinton in New York informing him that he would be the new commander of North America.

Sir Henry Clinton
(from Wikimedia)
While Clinton’s reputation was still intact in London, following the disgrace of Generals Howe and Burgoyne, it was not like the Ministry didn’t have serious doubts about him.  In fact, at the time Germain had written to Clinton to inform him of his new command, no one in London was quite sure if Clinton might already be on a ship bound for London to try to resign his command once again.

Clinton had never gotten along with the Howe Brothers and always held the opinion that he could do better than them.  He had never held such a large independent command.  His last independent command resulted in the failure to capture Fort Sullivan in 1776.  That incident led to his ongoing dispute with Commodore, by this time Admiral, Peter Parker, who would eventually replace Admiral Howe as the North American Naval Commander.  

One reason there was reluctance to replace the Howe Brothers was that it would end the unprecedented cooperation between the army and navy. Even when several other admirals were proposed to replace Howe, officials knew that army-navy cooperation would not be the same. The relationship between Clinton and Parker virtually assured that the relationship between the two services would go back to a rather cold and antagonistic one.  

Although Clinton would finally have the independent command he had wanted, he would find himself with a much smaller army than General Howe oversaw.  Burgoyne’s army was dispersed in POW camps and therefore unavailable.  London would not replace it.  Further, many regiments of regulars would be needed in other parts of the empire to protect against the new French threat of attack.  In March, London ordered the transfer of 5000 regulars to the Leeward Islands (what we today call the eastern Caribbean).  Another 3000 would go to East Florida.  These forces would capture the French island of St. Lucia and protect Britain’s island colonies from French attack.  Lord Sandwich also recalled several dozen ships of the line to protect the waters around England.

With his much smaller army, Clinton received orders to end offensive operations and consolidate his forces for a potential southern campaign to begin at the end of the year.  Further London instructed him to abandon Philadelphia and consolidate his army back in New York City.  There were even contingencies to abandon New York and move to Halifax if needed.

Peace Plan

The war with France also made officials more realistic about a negotiated peace with America.  Sending agent Paul Wentworth to France to meet with the American representatives had gone nowhere.  In fact, it probably helped to move along US negotiations with France.

Admiral Richard Howe
(from Wikimedia)
Despite that failure, Lord North still believed that some accommodation would be possible in America and that coming to terms was necessary so that Britain could focus on its new war with France.  As early as December 1777, soon after word of Saratoga arrived in London, Lord North had pushed for a new Peace Commission and for new laws that would convince Americans that they would get all the reforms that they had originally wanted.

The King objected to this policy.  He believed that peace talks would only divide politicians in London and strengthen the opposition.  At the same time, it would fail because the colonies were not willing, at this point, to accept anything less than independence by this time.  Also, the Elector of Bavaria had just died.  It was quite possible that France would have to go to war with Prussia and Austria over the selection of his successor.  With the King opposed, Lord North tabled discussion of a peace commission until February. 

When intelligence made clear that France was about to sign the treaty with the US, North once again resurrected the idea of a negotiated peace.  He got the King to accept the idea of making reforms that might lead a political compromise with America.  North pushed through Parliament laws that repealed the tax on tea, that repealed the Massachusetts Government Act, and which declared that Parliament would forever forego authority to tax the colonies, except for external customs duties.  Parliament also approved the formation of a Peace Commission.

Unlike the Howe Brothers Peace Commission which had no authority to offer anything other than pardons, this new peace commission put everything on the table, except complete independence.  Commissioners could offer protection of colonial charters, repeal of all objectionable taxes, guarantee of no peacetime standing armies in the colonies, restoration of trade, essentially everything the First Continental Congress had requested in its petition, and more.  Further, the commission could negotiate directly with the Second Continental Congress as if it were a legal entity.  

In April, the Commission, headed by the Earl of Carlisle, left for America. Their negotiations will be the topic of a future episode.

Next week, we return to Valley Forge as a Prussian officer named von Steuben brings professional training to the Continental Army.

- - -

Next Episode 175 Von Steuben at Valley Forge 



Contact me via email at mtroy.history@gmail.com

Follow the podcast on Twitter @AmRevPodcast

Join the Facebook group, American Revolution Podcast: https://www.facebook.com/groups/132651894048271

Click here to donate
American Revolution Podcast is distributed 100% free of charge. If you can chip in to help defray my costs, I'd appreciate whatever you can give.  Make a one time donation through my PayPal account.

You may also donate via VenmoZelle, or popmoney (send to mtroy1@yahoo.com)


Click here to see my Patreon Page
You can support the American Revolution Podcast as a Patreon subscriber.  This is an option for people who want to make monthly pledges.  Patreon support will give you access to Podcast extras and help make the podcast a sustainable project.



An alternative to Patreon is SubscribeStar.  For anyone who has problems with Patreon, you can get the same benefits by subscribing at SubscribeStar.

Click here to go to my SubscribeStar Page


Signup for our Mail List

* indicates required

Further Reading

Websites

A Biography of Lord North: http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/biographies/lord-north

Einhorn, Nathan R. “THE RECEPTION OF THE BRITISH PEACE OFFER OF 1778.” Pennsylvania History: A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies, vol. 16, no. 3, 1949, pp. 191–214. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/27769029

O'Shaughnessy, Andrew Jackson. “‘If Others Will Not Be Active, I Must Drive’: George III and the American Revolution.” Early American Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, 2004, pp. 1–46. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/23546502

Rabb, Reginald E. “The Role of William Eden in the British Peace Commission of 1778.” The Historian, vol. 20, no. 2, 1958, pp. 153–178. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/24437531

Free eBooks
(from archive.org unless noted)

(Anonymous) “Gentleman, for many years a resident in America” A letter to Lord George Germaine, giving an account of the origin of the dispute between Great Britain and the colonies, London: Printed for T. Whieldon and Waller, 1778. 

Lyman, Theodore The Diplomacy of the United States: being an account of the foreign relations of the country, from the first treaty with France, in 1778, to the present time, Boston: Wells and Lilly, 1828.

https://archive.org/details/correspondenceof02geor/

Lucas, Reginald Lord North, second earl of Guilford, 1732-1792, Vol. 1, London: A.L. Humphreys, 1913. 

Lyman, Theodore The Diplomacy of the United States: being an account of the foreign relations of the country, from the first treaty with France, in 1778, to the present time, Boston: Wells and Lilly, 1828. 

Trevelyan Sir George Otto The American Revolution Vol 4, London: Longman’s Green & Co. 1922 (original 1907). 

Books Worth Buying
(links to Amazon.com unless otherwise noted)*

Brown, Gerald Saxon The American Secretary: The Colonial Policy of Lord George Germain, 1775-1778, Univ. of Michigan Press, 1963

Drury, Bob & Clavin, Tom Valley Forge, Simon & Schuster, 2018.

Gruber, Ira D. The Howe Brothers & the American Revolution, Univ. of NC Press, 1974 (book recommendation of the week).

O'Shaughnessy, Andrew Jackson The Men Who Lost America: British Leadership, the American Revolution, and the Fate of the Empire, Yale Univ. Press, 2013

Schiff, Stacy A Great Improvisation: Franklin, France, and the Birth of America, Henry Holt & Co. 2005.

Valentine, Alan Lord George Germain, Clarendon, 1962

Valentine, Alan Lord North, Univ. of Oklahoma Press, 1967.

Wilcox, William B. Portrait of a General: Sir Henry Clinton in the War of Independence, Knopf, 1964. 

* As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.



 

Sunday, November 1, 2020

ARP173 Treaties with France


The arrival of Benjamin Franklin in France at the end of 1776 had heralded great excitement in France.  American liberty became a celebrated cause and many French officers had crossed the Atlantic to participate in the great contest.

Treaty of Alliance (from Smithsonian)

The French government, however, took a much more cautious view.  King’s rarely wanted to encourage excited calls of the people to overthrow their king, even if it was an enemy king.  That sort of thinking could set a bad precedent that might, you know, result in the King of France losing his head someday.

Even so, many French leaders thought the American rebellion might be a great opportunity to weaken their British rival.  An ongoing colonial rebellion would occupy the British ministry and sap the empire of men and money.  A weakened Britain might allow France to retake some of the colonies it lost to Britain in prior wars.

At the same time, France was not prepared economically or militarily to go to war with Britain.  Openly supporting the rebellion would bring on just such a war.  So despite the desire of the American Commissioners to form an alliance with France, the ministry played hard to get.  It refused to recognize the American diplomatic team in any official capacity or recognize American independence.  It had funneled covert military aid via the arms smuggling business set up by Silas Deane and Pierre Beaumarchais.  Whenever Britain called out France in these activities, officials were always shocked, SHOCKED, that a few bad apples were engaged in such behavior and acted to shut it down.

The greatest fear of those like French foreign minister Vergennes was that they would get caught up in a war with Britain, and that Britain would defeat or make a settlement with the Americans that would allow Britain to focus its full military might and wrath against France.  The fear prevented France from committing openly to the support of the United States in these first years of the war.

News of Saratoga

The American Commissioners in France, Benjamin Franklin, Silas Deane, and Arthur Lee spent all of 1777 trying to cajole France into a commitment, but could not get more than a come on baby, you know I love you, but I can’t leave my wife right now.  We have to keep our relationship on the down low for a little longer.

Through late summer and early fall of 1777 with news of Burgoyne’s capture of Fort Ticonderoga and Howe’s victory at Brandywine reaching Paris, the ministry thought the rebellion might be coming to an end.  It ceased all written communication with the commissioners.  Officials arrested a French ship captain accused of delivering war supplies to the Americans.  The government recovered several prize ships captured by the Americans which were in French ports, returning them to their British owners.  If the rebellion was about to end, France wanted to be able to maintain its relationship with Britain.  It was perfectly ready to kick the Americans to the curb in order to protect themselves from British wrath.

Franklin at Versailles (from Lib of Cong.)
When news of the surrender of Burgoyne’s army at Saratoga reached France in December, things really began to change.  Finally, there was proof that the Americans were a serious challenge for the British.  They could defeat an army of British regulars in the field and force the surrender of an entire army, something that not even European armies had done before.

News of General Washington’s defeat at Germantown also helped convince the French government that it was time to put a ring on it with America.  Washington had lost at Brandywine and then lost Philadelphia to General Howe’s Army.  For many countries, a military defeat and the loss of one’s capital would force them to sue for peace.  France was impressed that the Continentals were prepared to counter-attack so quickly by striking at Germantown.  It made clear there was no intent to give up, even if this attack was not successful.

In late November, Franklin received word that the Americans had defeated the British at Saratoga.  The letter was written before Burgoyne’s final surrender, but after it became clear that surrender was inevitable. Franklin passed along this information the Court of Versailles.  

Two days later, King Louis personally signed a request that the Commission resubmit a request for a formal alliance with France.  Franklin took a couple of weeks to draft the proposed treaty, submitting it to Versailles on December 8, 1777.

Deane Recalled

Although he would not know it for months, on that same day, December 8, the Continental Congress at York approved an order for Deane to return to America to give an account of the affairs in Europe.  This was another leap in the long running feud between Arthur Lee and Silas Deane.  

Silas Deane (Wikimedia)
In earlier episodes I had talked about Lee’s annoyance that Beaumarchais and Deane were benefitting from the covert aid that the French government wanted to go to America.  They had arranged sales contracts to send war supplies on credit to America, in exchange for promises of American tobacco to be sold in Europe.  Lee wanted in on those contracts and the valuable commissions that came along with them.  

He had, for some time, sent word back to important people in America that Deane and Beaumarchais were ripping off America by selling war supplies that the French government had secretly offered to provide free of charge.  Lee also complained that both Deane and Franklin had British spies working on their staffs and that they frequently refused to keep Deane up to speed about their discussions with officials at Versailles.

Since Lee had two brothers serving in the Continental Congress: Richard Henry Lee and Francis Lightfoot Lee, his accusations had a ready audience.  Others, including John and Samuel Adams and a number of other New England delegates also had questions after hearing Lee’s accusations.

As they were on the verge of signing a treaty, Deane remained in France for several more months before his return home to clear his name.  Lee’s determined opposition to his two fellow commissioners, however, remained an obstacle to negotiations.

Negotiations

Franklin and Deane largely seemed to keep Lee out of the details of many negotiations, as Lee had complained.  However, they had to include Lee in the treaty discussions that began in December.  They did not trust the man, and with good reason.  Lee was still corresponding with men in London.  Lee seemed to think that the British might still be willing to come to a political compromise with the US if they knew France was about to form an alliance.  Lee had lived in London for many years, up until late 1776, when he received his appointment as a commissioner in Paris.  He still had many friends among the Whig leaders in London.

Edward Bancroft
(from Wikimedia)

Lee was not the only leak of course.  Franklin’s personal secretary Edward Bancroft was also a paid British agent.  There were others on London’s payroll as well.  Nothing the commissioners did would escape the watchful eye of the North Ministry.

Although France had called for the negotiations, it did not seem to be in any hurry to complete them.  At first, France said it needed to operate in concert with Spain.  France and Spain had their own treaty which obligated France to get Spain’s approval on any agreements related to the Americas.  

Spain had already worked with France to provide some covert aid to the Americans, so it was not like this would come as a surprise to them.  Spain, however, quickly sent back word that they were not ready to support American Independence and would not approve any treaty.

With this, negotiations began to falter.  France was happy to take its time getting there, but the Americans were not.  They needed more aid right away.  Also, there was always the danger of a military setback that could cause France to end the negotiations.

British Peace Feelers

At this same time, officials in London were on high alert that an alliance between France and the American colonies would drastically alter the balance of power.  Britain could be fighting another war around the world to protect all of her colonies, many of which it had just taken from France and Spain in the 1760s.

King George III approved deployment of an agent to open up negotiations with the American Commissioners in Paris.  The British sent Paul Wentworth, who had also recruited many of the spies who were currently working with the American Commissioners.

When Wentworth reached Paris, he sent a complex series of instructions to Silas Deane to hold a secret meeting.  His anonymous note instructed Dean that he could find a coach at a specific place on the road outside of town.  There, Deane would receive a note instructing him to go to a room where he could meet with the secret negotiator.  Deane’s response was not quite so secretive.  He sent back a response saying he would be in his office the next day, and that if the caller wanted to stop by, Deane would be happy to receive him.

Wentworth and Deane eventually arranged a dinner to discuss the outline of ending hostilities.  London was prepared to allow the Americans to have their own Congress.  The American colonies would not be subject to any internal laws enacted by Parliament. They would only have to respect Parliament’s authority in matters of trade or foreign policy.  Further, Parliament would repeal any objectionable laws that had prompted the ongoing protests since the end of the Seven Years War.  To further sweeten the deal, any Americans who helped secure the peace could receive knighthoods, peerages, jobs, money, or other rewards for their help.

If Britain had made this offer in 1774 or even in late 1775, the Continental Congress would have been ecstatic.  It offered them everything they wanted, even more than the First Continental Congress had requested in its petitions.  

Benjamin Franklin
However it was not 1775 anymore. America had considered itself independent for a year and a half.  Two and a half years of war had split the two sides, and split them irrevocably.  Further, the Americans had proven they could defeat the British militarily and had no desire to go back to being colonies. The one thing Britain did not offer was recognition of full American independence.  By this time, American negotiators would accept nothing less.

The Commissioners would not meet formally with Wentworth, or any other British negotiators.  Then, the Americans received word that Spain had rejected the alliance and would not recognize American independence.  The momentum in favor of signing a treaty quickly evaporated as the French government reevaluated its position.  Moving forward without its Spanish ally was a much riskier prospect for France.

In response, Franklin met with British Agent Wentworth during the first week of January 1778.  According to Wentworth he even went so far as to discuss the possibility of recognition of independence.  Franklin’s agreed that it was a good offer, but then added “Pity it did not come sooner.

It appears that Franklin had no intention of actually negotiating peace terms with Britain.  Rather, Franklin wanted the word of his secret negotiations with Britain to leak back to French officials.  If France believed that Britain and America might come to an amicable peace, France’s chance to benefit from the British weakness would evaporate with it.  By letting the French know they were talking to the British, Franklin forced Foreign Minister Vergennes and the French to step up and negotiate a treaty without delay.

Franklin's gambit worked.  Two days after Franklin’s meeting with Wentworth, French officials asked him what would be necessary to have the commissioners end their negotiations with Britain.  Over the next few weeks, the commissioners worked with French negotiator Conrad Alexandre Gérard to produce the mutually agreeable details for a Treaty of Alliance and a Treaty of Amity and Commerce.

Treaty of Alliance

The first treaty created a military alliance between France and the United States.  It guaranteed that the United States would retain control of any land conquered in the war, including the formerly French Quebec.  France would take Bermuda and other island colonies in the West Indies that it had lost in the last war with Britain, as well as any other islands it might capture.

Both countries would aid each other in the likely impending war with Britain, and neither country would sign a separate peace with Britain until the other agreed.  Another article invited other countries to join the alliance. This was mostly targeted at Spain, even if not mentioned explicitly.

The treaty created a permanent alliance between the two countries, lasting beyond the hoped for victory over Britain.  

Treaty of Amity and Commerce

The Treaty of Alliance was one of two treaties that the negotiators were trying to finalize.  The other one, known as the Treaty of Amity and Commerce, caused a little more controversy.   The second treaty was essentially a trade agreement between the US and France.  You have to remember there was no such thing as free trade during this period.  Most of the larger empires required their colonies to trade only with the mother country, and no one else.  It was how they retained their wealth and power.

Treaty of Amity and Commerce
Trade between sovereign countries did happen, but it was not a given.  The Treaty of Amity and Commerce assured that the United States would have a European market for its trade goods, and gave France access to much desired raw materials from America.

Beyond allowing general trade, the treaty pledged protection of vessels from the other country when in each country’s jurisdiction.  Each country would restore property to the other if captured by pirates.  Privateers and warships could use each other’s ports.  Each country would provide protection to ships within their waters and provide assistance on the high seas.

Neither side would commission enemy privateers against the other, nor would they allow enemy privateers use of their ports.  Both countries could appoint consuls and agents to work out of ports in the other country.

Authorities in both countries could search ships for contraband, but guaranteed due process for any contraband seized.  On the high seas, ships of war or privateers could search merchant ships only once. Merchant ships would carry passports and manifests.

Private parties of either country could purchase and own land in the other.  They could not, however, fish off the other country’s waters, other than off the banks of Newfoundland. 

Both parties retained the right to trade with enemy states as long as the goods were not declared to be contraband.

There was also an agreement that if the treaty ever ended, both countries would give merchant ships six months protection in their territory.  This allowed for time to get the word out to merchant ships about the change in status.

Two articles in the thirty-three article treaty caused some contention.  Arthur Lee, the only lawyer on the American side, objected to Articles 11 and 12.  These gave the US duty-free access to molasses from French island colonies, but gave the French duty-free access to all exports from America.  Lee believed this was too one-sided and gave a great trade advantage to France.  

The two other American Commissioners, Franklin and Deane, were not nearly as concerned.  First, they just wanted to get a treaty in place, even if not perfect.  Having a French trading partner would be a huge coup for the United States.  Secondly, as merchants, they were not crazy about their own government being able to levy export duties on goods shipped abroad anyway.

At first, Lee acceded to the other commissioners, but the next day insisted that they write back to the French negotiators and insist that Articles 11 and 12 be rewritten.  The French, however, held firm and refused to make any changes.  This dispute, which held up final ratification, became another source of dispute between Lee on one side, and Franklin and Deane on the other.  

Treaty Approval

By February 5, 1778, the two sides were ready to sign the treaties.  Although Franklin was well known in France for wearing his simple brown homespun coat to all events, on this occasion he wore a much fancier blue velvet suit.  It was the same suit he had worn almost exactly four years earlier in London when he was humiliated in the cockpit for his revelation of private correspondence.  That had marked the end of his career as an agent in Britain.  When Deane asked why he wore it, Franklin said “for a little revenge” and then recounted the day of his humiliation in the cockpit in London.

Signing the Treaties (from Wikimedia)
After having shown up on the 5th, the Commissioners were told that Gérard was sick and could not meet with them.  Instead, they had to return the next day, February 6.  The commissioners on behalf of the US, and Gérard on behalf of France, signed the treaty on February 6, 1778.  Except, Lee refused to sign the Treaty of Amity and Commerce.

While Gérard's signature had committed France, it wanted the treaty kept secret for a few more weeks while France attempted to get Spain on board with the new treaty.  The parties agreed to keep it a secret. Franklin then gave the treaty to his secretary Edward Bancroft.  The British spy immediately made a copy and had it in London less than two days later.

A month later, on March 13, the French ambassador in London formally informed the North Ministry that France had recognized American independence.  Four days later, March 17, Britain declared war on France.  With all that out in the open, King Louis formally received the American Commissioners at court for the first time on March 20.  

Back in America, the Congress at York joyfully received news of the treaties.  It did not receive the actual treaties until May 2, but approved them on May 4.  The next day, May 5, it rejected Articles 11 and 12 based on Arthur Lee’s letters.  Those controversial trade rules would be removed from the final treaties.

That aside, the treaties marked a new stage of the war.  No longer would the war be a simple rebellion.  It was now becoming a new world war between the powers of Europe.  On May 5, after receiving word of Congress’ approval, Washington issued a general order that “Upon a signal given, the whole Army will Huzza! 'Long Live the King of France.'”

Next week, we will hear how London is dealing with these very changed circumstances.

- - -

Next Episode 174 Britain and France Go To War 



Contact me via email at mtroy.history@gmail.com

Follow the podcast on Twitter @AmRevPodcast

Join the Facebook group, American Revolution Podcast: https://www.facebook.com/groups/132651894048271

Click here to donate
American Revolution Podcast is distributed 100% free of charge. If you can chip in to help defray my costs, I'd appreciate whatever you can give.  Make a one time donation through my PayPal account.

You may also donate via VenmoZelle, or popmoney (send to mtroy1@yahoo.com)

Click here to see my Patreon Page
You can support the American Revolution Podcast as a Patreon subscriber.  This is an option for people who want to make monthly pledges.  Patreon support will give you access to Podcast extras and help make the podcast a sustainable project.



An alternative to Patreon is SubscribeStar.  For anyone who has problems with Patreon, you can get the same benefits by subscribing at SubscribeStar.

Click here to go to my SubscribeStar Page

Further Reading

Websites

Treaty of Alliance (full text) https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=false&doc=4&page=transcript

Treaty of Alliance with France https://www.loc.gov/rr/program/bib/ourdocs/alliance.html

Treaty of Amity and commerce (full text) https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fr1788-1.asp

Paul Wentworth: https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/wentworth-paul

Free eBooks
(from archive.org unless noted)

Journals of Congress Vol. 3 January 1, 1777 - January 1, 1778. 

Chinard, Gilbert (ed) The Treaties of 1778, and Allied Documents, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1928 (borrow only).

Deas, Anne Izard (ed) Correspondence of Mr. Ralph Izard, of South Carolina, from the year 1774 to 1804; with a short memoir, Vol. 1, C. S. Francis, 1844.

Hale, Edward E. Franklin in France, Roberts Brothers, 1883.

Isham, Charles (ed) The Deane Papers, New York Historical Society, 1887.

Lyman, Theodore The Diplomacy of the United States: being an account of the foreign relations of the country, from the first treaty with France, in 1778, to the present time, Boston: Wells and Lilly, 1828. 

Prowell, George R. Continental Congress at York, Pennsylvania and York County in the Revolution, The York Printing Co., 1914.

Sparks, Jared (ed) The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, Vol. 1,  Hale, Gray & Brown, 1829. 

Trevelyan Sir George Otto The American Revolution Vol 4, London: Longman’s Green & Co. 1922 (original 1907). 

Books Worth Buying
(links to Amazon.com unless otherwise noted)*

Burnett, Edmund Cody, The Continental Congress, Macmillan Co. 1941.

Drury, Bob & Clavin, Tom Valley Forge, Simon & Schuster, 2018.

Isaacson, Walter Benjamin Franklin: An American Life, Simon & Schuster, 2003.

Montross, Lynn The Reluctant Rebels, Harper & Brothers, 1950.

Paul, Joel Richard Unlikely Allies: How a Merchant, a Playwright, and a Spy Saved the American Revolution, Riverhead, 2009. 

Schiff, Stacy A Great Improvisation: Franklin, France, and the Birth of America, Henry Holt & Co. 2005.

* As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.