Sunday, April 19, 2026

ARP384 Rebirth of the US Navy

During the Revolutionary War, the Continentals never had much of a navy.  They managed to launch thirteen relatively small frigates, which were converted merchant vessels armed with a few cannons.  Most of the naval power came from privateers.  Even many state navies were larger than the Continental Navy.  

No Navy

Despite its small size, Congress could not even afford that handful of ships.  The few ships that had not been captured or destroyed during the war were sold off at the war's end.  One ship that was not quite finished, and which the government could not afford to finish, was given to France as a gift. France ended up decommissioning the ship and trashing it as it was not considered sea worthy. The Continentals held onto a single 36 gun frigate after the war, the Alliance.  John Paul Jones had captained it for a time.  John Barry commanded her when she fought the last naval battle of the Revolutionary War off the coast of Havana on March 10, 1783.  Even the cost of that single ship was too much expense for Congress.  They auctioned off the Alliance in 1785 to a Philadelphia merchant.

USS Constitution
Officers in the Continental Navy petitioned Congress to give them half-pay, which was the normal procedure in Britain for officers who were not on active duty.  Congress declined, arguing that there was no more navy.  It had been dissolved.  There were no ships, no officers, no sailors, nothing.  A few states maintained their own small state navies, but these were nothing that could take on foreign powers.

After establishing the Constitution, the Congress began reestablishing an army, but no navy.  The army was needed to deal with Indians.  There was no immediate naval threat, and what threats did exist could not be confronted with any pitiably small navy that Congress could afford.  So, for several years, Congress ignored the issue of having no navy.  The Treasury Department under Hamilton formed what would later be called the Coast Guard, building a few small ships that would be on the lookout for smugglers trying to avoid import duties.  But there was nothing that could challenge an enemy warship.

Merchant shipping got off to a slow start after the war.  In 1783, following the peace treaty, Britain banned US merchant ships for entering any port in the British West Indies.  Before the war, colonists made most of their trade income carrying food to the West Indies to feed the large slave populations on islands that did not want to waste space growing their own food for the slaves instead of valuable cash crops like sugar.

The cut off of British ports caused American trade to suffer in the post war years  Some trade continued when British officials were willing to look the other way. But by 1788, US trade with the British West Indies was about half what it had been before the Revolution.  Prices for exports fell  Many New England fishermen moved to Nova Scotia so that they could continue to trade with the British colonies in the West Indies.  Before the war, New England also had a strong ship building business, building ships for British merchants.  Britain also forbade British merchants from buying ships from America.  Economic depression hit the port cities, especially in New England.  The weak economy created higher unemployment and led to the foreclosures that had resulted in revolts like Shays Rebellion.

American merchants began looking for other markets.  In 1785, a ship out of New York sailed all the way to China, bringing back a profitable cargo.  Many other ships followed, opening up a growing trade with China.  Others found new opportunities in Bengal, where the East India Company was still willing to trade with American merchants.  They also found new markets in the Baltic and in Mediterranean ports.  Others sailed for West African ports to continue the slave trade. 

France was also considered an important new trading partner.  When Jefferson became the French Ambassador in 1784, one of his first priorities was to establish more commercial treaties, both with France and with the French West Indies.

Trade picked up over time.  When most of Europe went to war with Revolutionary France, European ports were willing to pay top dollar for American products. Many of the products made in America could be sold for two or three times the cost in foreign ports. 

As American merchant vessels began to spread across the globe, the lack of a navy to support them became more and more of an issue.  Many Americans had naively thought that since they were not at war with anyone, their vessels would be largely safe sailing the high seas.  This was not the case.

Barbary Pirates

The need for a navy became more pressing over the years.  When the new war in Europe began, it became downright urgent.  Washington had declared neutrality, primarily to protect US shipping.  That did not work. As Alexander Hamilton warned in one of his Federalist papers: "A nation, despicable by its weakness, forfeits even the privilege of being neutral.” 

In 1793, Britain ordered the seizure of all neutral vessels headed to France or the French West Indies.  Any cargos were seized as contraband. Britain had embarked on a policy of starving out the French.  After the Revolutionaries had executed so many land owners, they found the peasants were incapable of managing the farms.  French agricultural productivity plummeted and the famine stricken nation was dependent on imports.  The British wanted to deny any relief to the enemy.

Frequently, the British Navy would take captured American crew members and impress them into British service. During wartime especially the Royal Navy was in desperate need of capable sailors.  English speaking sailors were especially in demand.  

France also became a threat to American shipping. French authorities found it easier to seize American merchant ships at sea.  They kept the ships, confiscated the cargo and threw crews into prison where they were held for ransom.  That proved much more profitable than actually buying the cargoes.

US authorities protested these actions, but neither Britain nor France cared.  What could the US do other than protest? It had no navy to threaten any sort of retaliation.  

It wasn’t just major powers that picked on easy American prizes at sea.  In 1785, the same year that Congress sold off its last warship, ships from the Barbary states captured American merchant ships in the Mediterranean.   They kept the ships and cargo and put the crews to work as slaves.  US negotiators had to provide ransoms to get their return.  Attacks continued, and some American sailors remained held as slaves for years.  In 1792, the Dey of Algiers demanded a ransom of $60,000 for the return of one hundred Americans and a dozen ships.  

The Mediterranean became off limits to American shipping.  In 1793, the situation worsened.  Portugal had been blockading the strait of Gibraltar, keeping Barbary ships bottled up in the Mediterranean.  Portugal and Algiers negotiated a truce, ending the blockade.  Algerian cruisers sailed into the Atlantic, capturing ten American merchant ships in October of that year, the first month that they could get into the open seas.  American merchant ships were easy prey, and there was no danger of retaliation of an American Navy that did not exist.

Naval Act of 1794

Congress had been debating establishing a Navy for years.  The Constitution had explicitly authorized Congress to provide for and maintain a navy. The administration had recommended this.  In 1790, Secretary of War Henry Knox submitted estimates for the construction of several frigates.  Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson also recommended the construction of a small fleet based on his prior diplomatic dealings with the Barbary states.

Congress dithered.  The country was still trying to get its debt under control, and the people would not tolerate higher taxes.  In 1793, the Senate endorsed the idea of a navy, but only “as soon as the state of the public finances will admit.”

The expansion of Barbary attacks on American shipping in the Atlantic finally focused Congress’ attention.  Word of the October attacks reached Philadelphia by the end of the year. On January, 2, 1794 the House of Representatives enacted a resolution that the government needed “a naval force adequate to the protection of the commerce of the United States, against the Algerine corsairs”.  Even then, the vote was pretty closely divided.  The matter was referred to a committee to study the matter.

The committee was largely made up of New Englanders who supported a navy.  Several committee members owned ships themselves  After less than three weeks, the committee recommended building four large 44 gun frigates and two smaller 20 gun ships. The committee estimated the cost for the fleet would be $600,000.  This may not sound like much today, but this was close to 15% of the entire federal budget.  In 1793, the government spent a total of $4.5 million including debt retirement.  The committee's estimate would also prove to be a rather low estimate of the actual cost.

Opposition to a navy remained strong in Congress.  Leading the opposition was none other than Congressman James Madison. He and other Republicans viewed a permanent navy as that one opponent called a “self-feeding organism.”  It would result in higher taxes, and more debt.  Opposition was particularly strong in southern and western states.  They viewed a navy as yet another subsidy to New England merchants.  Wealthy ship owners in large northeastern towns were essentially trying to use the tax dollars of southern and western farmers to get free security for their assets.

Beyond the cost of a navy, some also voiced ideological opposition. Like a standing army in peacetime, a standing navy was a symbol of a military autocracy.  Even worse, a standing navy cost much more than a standing army.  It was something meant for the projection of power abroad.  America only needed a military to defend its land.  A navy contributed little to that.  One opponent characterized all navies as “the playthings of kings and tyrants.”

In response, pro-navy advocates argued that a navy was necessary for the US economy.  Marine insurance premiums had increased to 25% of the value of a ship and its cargo.  This imposed a $2 million burden on the cost of trade, which impacted everyone who purchased imported goods or who had their crops or other products sold abroad.  These costs far exceeded the cost of building and maintaining a navy and would fall considerably if the Navy deterred attacks on American shipping.  Supporters also raised the issue of national pride.  America had to have a navy if it expected foreign powers to treat it as a sovereign power.

Debate raged in the House for over a month.  This was really controversial.  In the end, the issue of the Barbary pirates kidnapping and enslaving American sailors seemed to push the majority in favor of building the ships.  To get to the majority, those in favor had to accept a Republican amendment that if the US reached a truce with Algiers, that construction of the ships would halt immediately.

The final House bill included six ships as proposed by the committee. There would be four 44 gun frigates.  The two smaller 20 gun frigates were upgraded to 36 guns each.  

The bill gave the president the authority to appoint six captains who would each supervise the construction of their frigate.  The bill also got into the details for all the officers, pay, and details over rations for the crew, even though it would be years before the ships would be ready to sail.

The House passed the bill on March 10, by a vote of 50 to 39.  Voting was pretty strongly divided by region.  Northern representatives voted for the bill.  Representatives from southern and western states voted no.  The Senate did not seem to find the bill nearly as controversial.  After minimal debate, the Senate passed the bill with a voice vote.  President Washington signed the bill on March 29, 1794.  The final appropriation for the project in that bill was $688,888.

Naval Appointments

Oversight for building the new navy fell to Henry Knox, the Secretary of War.  Congress would not create a separate Secretary of the Navy until 1798, after several of the ships were completed.  Even before Congress passed the naval bill, Knox began looking for a ship designer.  He selected Joshua Humphreys, considered the most talented ship builder in America. 

Humphreys had been building ships since he was apprenticed to a Philadelphia ship builder at age 14. By age 20, he was a master shipwright with his own yard.  Despite his Quaker upbringing, Humphreys supported the patriots during the revolution.  He built several warships and outfitted more privateers.  By 1794 he had designed, built, or repaired hundreds of ships

Humphreys recommended a radical new design for the proposed frigates. The ships would be longer and wider than most ships of similar ratings at the time.  They would carry large 24 pound canons at a time when most ships maxed out at 18 pounders. This would give the ships greater firing range and could inflict more damage per shot.  They were designed with the purpose of intimidating the smaller Barbary ships, but Humphreys could see them being a real threat to British ships as well.

A 44 gun ship would be only a 5th rate ship in the British Navy.  They had plenty that were larger and with more guns.  But the size and speed of the new American frigates, along with greater range and firepower, would be able to surprise the enemy with the greater firepower in such a smaller ship. 

His new designs drew criticism that they would not be as stable or structurally sound as European ships.  They also had a heavier draw, meaning they could not follow enemies into shallower waters.  In the end, the government accepted his designs for the ships, and building commenced.

Washington and Knox worked together to come up with the names for each of the ships and determine where they would be built.  The President wanted each ship built in a separate town, in part to spread out the economic benefits of the project, but also to prevent any single town from becoming the exclusive expert in building ships for the navy.

President Washington also appointed navy captains within a few months of passage.  The most senior captain appointed was John Barry, who would oversee the building of the ship named the United States in Philadelphia.  Barry would also have input on the other appointments.

Barry was the only captain who had appeared on the original captain’s list of the Continental Navy back in 1775.  I won’t get into all of his commands during the Revolution but he ended the war as one of its naval heroes.  Following the war, he returned to the command of merchant vessels.  By 1794, he was nearly 50 years old, but had a great war reputation and was still ready for action.  Washington would later appoint him commodore of the entire fleet.

Second in seniority was Samuel Nicholson, tasked with overseeing the construction of the Constitution in Boston.  Nicolson had served as a lieutenant under Lambert Wickes and later under John Paul Jones during the war.  He commanded one of the smaller ships alongside the Bonhomme Richard during its famous battle with the Serapis. Later in the war he captained the 32 gun frigate the Deane.  He spent many years after the war trying to get paid prize money for ships he had captured during the war.

The third appointment went to Richard Dale, who oversaw construction of the Chesapeake in Norfolk. Dale’s war service during the Revolution began as a lieutenant of a ship commissioned by Virginia.  His ship was quickly captured by the British and impressed into British service. Later, his ship was captured by John Barry in command of the Lexington at the time. Dale happily volunteered for service and became a midshipman.  The British captured him again, holding him as a prisoner until he returned to the Lexington.  Captured a third time, Dale was imprisoned in England.  After his escape, he joined John Paul Jones on the Bonhomme Richard.  Dale was captured again, imprisoned in British occupied New York City.  After his exchange, he went to work on a privateer ship. He never served as a captain during the war, but became a merchant captain after the war, and also married a relative of John Barry.

The fourth appointment went to James Sever, who oversaw the Congress being built in Portsmouth. Sever had been in the army during the war, joining late at age 20 in 1781 after graduating from Harvard. He had no naval experience, prior to his appointment but had been a merchant captain after the war.

Silas Talbot got the fifth appointment, building the President in New York. Talbot had served in the Continental Army, but volunteered for the navy when the Continental Congress established one.  Although he commanded several small ships in the navy, he retained his army commission, rising to the rank of lieutenant colonel.  Although he received a naval commission as a captain in 1779, Congress did not have any ships available, so he took command of a privateer ship.  The British captured that ship and he remained a prisoner until 1781.  After the war, Talbot served as a ship’s captain in the slave trade.  He settled in New York where he got elected to the state assembly.  He was serving in the US Congress when the president appointed him to be the captain of the President.

The sixth and final appointment went to Thomas Truxtun to supervise construction of the ship Constellation in Baltimore.  Truxton had been born in New York but went to sea at age 12.  When the Revolutionary War began, he was impressed into the British Navy.  While he had no choice in serving, he declined an appointment as midshipman.  After being wounded, he escaped and commanded several privateer ships under a Continental letter of marque.  After the war he was a successful merchant captain, making one of the first trips to China from the United States.

Work on the project began almost immediately.  Washington approved the ship designs on April 16, less than three weeks after the bill was signed into law.  Over the summer, the government began establishing federal navy yards in each of the six towns that would build the ships.  By fall, teams were already harvesting oak timber from St. Simon’s Island in Georgia to build the ships.  By the end of the year, the first keel was already laid in Philadelphia.  The project would take years to complete, but was already well underway.

Next week: The government faces another internal rebellion over the tax on whiskey.

 - - -

Next Episode 385 Whiskey Rebellion(coming soon)

Previous Episode 383 Eli Whitney & Dolley Madison

 Contact me via email at mtroy.history@gmail.com

 Follow the podcast on X (formerly Twitter) @AmRevPodcast

 Join the Facebook group, American Revolution Podcast 

 Join American Revolution Podcast on Quora 
 
Discuss the AmRev Podcast on Reddit

American Revolution Podcast Merch!

T-shirts, hoodies, mugs, pillows, totes, notebooks, wall art, and more.  Get your favorite American Revolution logo today.  Help support this podcast.  https://merch.amrevpodcast.com


American Revolution Podcast is distributed 100% free of charge. If you can chip in to help defray my costs, I'd appreciate whatever you can give.  Make a one time donation through my PayPal account. You may also donate via Venmo (@Michael-Troy-20).


Click here to see my Patreon Page
You can support the American Revolution Podcast as a Patreon subscriber.  This is an option making monthly pledges.  Patreon support will give you access to ad-free episodes, podcast extras, and help make the podcast a sustainable project.

An alternative to Patreon is SubscribeStar.  For anyone who has problems with Patreon, you can get the same benefits by subscribing at SubscribeStar.

Signup for the AmRev Podcast Mail List

* indicates required

Further Reading

Websites

The Naval Act of 1794: https://www.mountvernon.org/education/primary-source-collections/primary-source-collections/article/the-naval-act-of-1794

President Washington Signs the Naval Act of 1794: 27 March 1794 https://www.history.navy.mil/browse-by-topic/heritage/origins-of-the-navy/washington-naval-act-1794.html

The Reestablishment of the Navy, 1787-1801: https://www.history.navy.mil/research/library/bibliographies/reestablishment-navy-1787-1801.html

March 27th, 1794: The Navy As We Know Now: https://usnforlife.com/blogs/usnforlife-blog/march-27th-1794-the-navy-as-we-know-now-nbsp

The Navy: The Continental Period, 1775-1890: https://www.history.navy.mil/content/history/nhhc/research/library/online-reading-room/title-list-alphabetically/h/history-of-the-us-navy/continental-period.html

Bauer, K. Jack. “Naval Shipbuilding Programs 1794-1860.” Military Affairs, vol. 29, no. 1, 1965, pp. 29–40. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1985025

The Seventh Frigate https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval-history-magazine/2020/august/seventh-frigate

Free eBooks
(from archive.org unless noted)

Brant, Irving James Madison: Father of the Constitution, 1787-1800. Bobbs-Merrill Co. 1950 (borrow only). 

Griffin, Martin I. J. The story of Commodore John Barry, "father of the American navy" Philadelphia: Society of the Friendly Sons of St. Patrick, 1908. 

Maas, John R. Defending a New Nation 1783-1811, Washington, DC: Center of Military History, 2013. (US Army website).

Meany, William Barry Commodore John Barry, the father of the American navy, New York: Harper & Brothers, 1911. 

Books Worth Buying
(links to Amazon.com unless otherwise noted)*

Chernow, Ron Alexander Hamilton, Penguin Press, 2004. 

Chernow, Ron Washington, A Life, Penguin Press, 2010. 

Chervinsky, Lindsay M. The Cabinet: George Washington and the Creation of an American Institution, Belknap Press, 2020. 

Elkins, Stanley M. and Eric McKitrick, The Age of Federalism: The Early American Republic, 1788–1800, Oxford Univ. Press, 1993 (borrow on archive.org). 

McDonald, Forrest, The Presidency of George WashingtonUniv of Kansas Press, 1974.

Meacham, Jon Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power, Random House, 2012.

Miller, John C. Alexander Hamilton and the Growth of the New Nation, Routledge, 2017.

Miller, Nathan The U.S. Navy: A History, Naval Institute Press, 1977. 

Randall, Willard Sterne Thomas Jefferson: A Life, Henry Holt and Co. 1993.

Toll, Ian W. Six Frigates: The Epic History of the Founding of the US Navy, W.W. Norton & Co. 2006. 

Unger, Harlow G. "Mr. President": George Washington and the Making of the Nation's Highest Office, Da Capo Press, 2013.

* As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Sunday, April 12, 2026

ARP383 Eli Whitney & Dolley Madison

A few weeks ago, I mentioned that Congress had made some changes to the patent law in 1793, making it easier to register new patents.  In 1794 a new patent would be registered that would change the south forever.

Mulberry Grove 

It all started at the Mulberry Grove Plantation.  Before the war, Royal Lieutenant Governor John Graham owned Mulberry Grove, which sits along the Savannah River, just northwest of the city of Savannah.  Graham fled back to Britain in 1776, abandoning his property.  The patriot government seized the property at the end of the war in 1783.  

Eli Whitney
State officials gifted the plantation to General Nathanael Greene, for his services in defending the state during the Revolutionary War.  They gifted the neighboring Richmond Plantation to Anthony Wayne.

General Greene had been from Rhode Island.  He had incurred massive debts during the war, most of which were to help pay for the military campaigns that he had headed in his defense of the south.  Congress, as they were doing with everyone at the time, either denied or delayed his claims for reimbursement.  His creditors were not as patient.  He ended up selling his home in Rhode Island as part of the effort to pay down his debts, and opted to settle on Mulberry Grove in Georgia. 

Mulberry Grove had been a profitable rice plantation before the war.  Greene believed he could make it profitable again.  In addition to the land, he would need some startup capital.  Greene was able to obtain loans, including one from Robert Morris, the Philadelphia merchant who had also helped to finance the war.

Around this time, Greene, who had been raised a Quaker, told a friend that he believed there was no defense of slavery.  Despite those moral objections, his desire to support himself and his family caused him to take ownership of more than a hundred slaves. Some had come with the plantation.  Others he purchased at auction in Charleston and St. Augustine.

While trying to get his plantation up and running, Greene had to fend off lawsuits from creditors.  In June, 1786, Greene travelled with his wife Caty to Savannah in an attempt to convince a creditor to delay his collection efforts.  He returned home in an open carriage without a hat.  The Georgia sun took its toll and gave him a headache. He went straight to bed, but woke the next morning feeling even worse.  They called for a doctor, who bled him, but that did not seem to help.  After a few more days in bed, he died on June 19, 1786. Cause of death was heatstroke.

This left his wife, Caty Greene in control of Mulberry Grove.  Caty was now a 31 year-old widow with five children.  She also inherited all of her husband’s debts.  Greene’s first instinct was to move back to Rhode Island to be with her family.  But several men, including Anthony Wayne, and her family’s tutor Phineas Miller, convinced her to stay.  Her only chance of getting out of debt would be to continue to grow and sell rice on the plantation.  Miller agreed to take over management of the plantation.

This change also meant that Greene’s children would need a new tutor.  In 1792, they asked Yale President Ezra Stiles if he could recommend anyone. Stiles recommended an older student in his late twenties named Ely Whitney.  He had recently graduated and planned to study law, but could not afford law school.  Instead, Whitney accepted the tutoring position and moved to Georgia.

On his arrival in 1792, Whitney reported to several friends that Caty Greene and Phineas Miller were essentially living as husband and wife.  The two had not married since Greene was still trying to get Congress to pay off her husband’s debts, and they agreed her status as the widow of General Greene would carry more weight with Congress than if she became Mrs. Miller.

Ginning Cotton

At that time, the primary cash crops in the south were rice and indigo.  Further north, tobacco still dominated.  Cotton grew well in the region but could not be produced profitably.  The hard part was removing the seeds from the cotton.  It was a slow and tedious process.  One person had a hard time extracting seeds from just one pound of cotton in a day.  Even with slave labor, that simply wasn’t a profitable use of time.  Whitney listened to discussions of locals who had a discussion about the problem at Mulberry Grove.

Whitney didn’t know anything about cotton production until he arrived in Georgia. He had grown up in Massachusetts, where his father had run a mill.  As a boy, he saw how machines could accomplish tasks that would be much harder to do by hand.  As a teenager, he produced and sold things like nails, hatpins, and walking sticks.

Over the winter of 1792-93, in his spare time, Whitney began working on a machine that could separate cotton from seeds automatically.  He came up with a device that passed raw cotton through a rotating wooden cylinder with rows of wire hooks that pulled out the raw cotton fibers and caused the seeds to fall away as the cotton passed through a narrow grate that was smaller than the cotton seeds.

He still needed a way to get the cotton off of the hooks.  Caty suggested a second cylinder with brush bristles that would sweep against the teeth and brush the cotton fibers into a separate bin. All of this work could be done by a single person who dumped raw cotton into the top, and then turned a hand crank that did all the work. 

By spring of 1793, Whitney had a working model that allowed a single person to produce over fifty pounds of cotton per day.  He dubbed it the Cotton Gin.  Realizing how revolutionary this would be, he applied for and received a patent signed by President Washington in March 1794.

He also formed a partnership with Caty Greene and Phineas Miller. Greene provided him with startup capital to begin production.  Whitney’s first problem was that the south simply wasn’t set up for industrial production.  He could not find trained workmen or easily get the materials to produce cotton gins.  Instead, he established his factory in New Haven, Connecticut.  He had become familiar with the area while attending Yale, knew he could find men who could do the job, and had access to materials through imports from New York City.

He had the factory operational by early 1794, even before he received his patent.  By early 1795, he had produced 26 cotton gins.  Greene began to advertise their availability in the Savannah Gazette.

The next problem was that farmers didn’t have any money to buy the cotton gins.  Farmers were notoriously cash poor and could not afford a large up-front investment.  Instead, Whitney would give away the cotton gins, subject to an agreement that the farmer would give 40% of the processed cotton back to the company as compensation.  This was a great deal for the farmers.  Instead of producing only one pound of cotton per worker per day, they could keep 30 of the 50 pounds that they could produce with the gin.

Things seemed to be moving along well when disaster struck in March 1795 on a day when Whitney was in New York. The workmen left the workshop for breakfast, when a fire broke out and consumed the workshop very quickly.  It destroyed the building, all of the specialized tools that Whitney had constructed, as well as twenty nearly completed gins. It also burned all of his drawings and papers regarding his creation of the manufacturing process.

Miller and Greene provided him with additional credit, Greene even put up Mulberry Grove as collateral for a business loan.  Whitney was able to rebuild all of his machinery from memory.  The rebuilding went remarkably fast.  Seven months after the fire, Whitney’s new factory completed twenty-six finished machines to ship to Georgia.

The cotton gin proved wildly popular.  Farmers began planting much more cotton.  It became an extremely lucrative cash crop.

In May of 1796, Caty Greene travelled with Phineas Miller where they visited the Washingtons.  Greene had gotten to know George and Martha Washington during the war, when she spent years with her husband General Nathanael Greene.  Washington had visited Mulberry Grove during his 1791 southern tour, and in 1796, Caty returned the visit, calling on the Washingtons at the presidential mansion in Philadelphia.  The Washingtons were happy to see her, but expressed concerns that she and Phineas had not married, that it could be problematic for their reputation.  Caty and Phineas decided to marry, right there and then.  They held a private ceremony in the presidential mansion in Philadelphia, with George and Martha as witnesses.. 

Unfortunately, Whitney, Greene, and Miller never personally benefitted from the invention as much as the should have.  Within a few years, copycat gins began showing up all over Georgia.  Farmers did not like having to give 40% of their yield to the inventor.  It was much cheaper to buy a pirated gin and keep everything.

Farmers quickly grew resentful of this Yankee who was taking nearly half of their hard earned crop.  When Whitney sued for patent violations, most Georgia juries refused to find in his favor.  Even when he won cases, Whitney often had to spend more in legal fees than he could collect in damages. Georgia Governor James Jackson, in response to appeals by farmers, even tried to have the state legislature suppress Whitney’s patent.

Despite these legal fights, the Cotton Gin changed southern agriculture, creating a while new cash crop in what became known as King Cotton.

Madison Gets Married

Another marriage took place in Philadelphia around the same time as the one between Greene and Miller. James Madison had been a major player in the establishment of the federal government, but he never seemed particularly lucky in love.  He was small in stature, reportedly only 5’ 4” tall and only a little over 100 pounds.  He was also rather shy, especially around women.  He had courted several of them when he was younger, but never managed to get a yes.

By 1794, Madison was a 43 year old bachelor.  Dolley was only 26 years old.  She was considered a great beauty, and had a very outgoing personality, something that caused her to struggle with as a young Quaker.  She had been born in Virginia, but her family moved to Philadelphia when she was just 15 years old.  Her father arranged for Dolley to marry John Todd when she was 21 years old.  The following year, 1792, her father died and her mother opened a boarding house to support herself.  

Dolley seemed to be doing pretty well.  She and her husband quickly produced two sons.  Then came the yellow fever epidemic of 1793.  Dolley’s husband, John, sent her with the two children to a small village outside of Philadelphia while he stayed and worked to help victims in the city as well as attend to his business.  Most of the family got sick. Dolley remained in bed for weeks suffering from fever and the other brutal effects.  As she was getting better, she learned that both her husband and her baby William both died on the same day, October 14. 

Dolley, a 25 year old widow with a two year old son Payne, had a total of $19 dollars to support the family. Her mother had fled Philadelphia to go stay with her other daughter Lucy, who had married George Steptoe Washington, a nephew of the president, who lived on a plantation in Virginia.  Dolley was on her own in Philadelphia.

She should have had her husband’s estate to support her but her brother in law, James Todd decided to keep her rightful inheritance from her and left her with nothing.  Her husband had not named an executor in his will.  Dolley, because she was a woman, could not sue on her own in court.  She began barraging James with daily letters, demanding her money, but he refused.  Finally, Dolley was able to retain an attorney to represent her in court.  After several months, she finally received access to her husband’s estate.

Following a period of mourning, Dolley began to be out and about around town.  She attracted the attention of many men, including James Madison.  As I said, the two were an unlikely pair.  He was 17 years older, and four inches shorter than Dolley.  She was considered a fun, attractive, outgoing woman, while Madison had a reputation of being rather dour, dreary, and a bit of a hypochondriac.  

Madison asked Senator Aaron Burr to introduce him to Dolley.  Burr was living in Dolley’s mother’s boarding house and knew her well.  In fact, Burr had become the temporary male guardian of Dolley’s living son Payne.  

At this time Burr was still married to Theodosia. She was the wife of a British officer who had lived with Burr for many years before her husband died and they were finally married.  He and Theodosia had a daughter who was around ten years old at this time. His wife was ten years older than Burr and had been sick for many years.  She remained in New York while Burr lived in Philadelphia doing his work as a US Senator.  During this time, Burr fathered two other children with an Indian servant named Mary Emmons. There are stories that Burr had his own interest in Dolley. But in this case, he appeared to act as a gentleman and introduced her to a very interested Madison.

Dolley and Jemmy, as she soon began calling him, hit it off almost immediately.  Madison was clearly smitten.  She also found Madison to be a delight.  While Madison appeared very formal, even somber, in public, he apparently had a good wit and loved telling funny stories in private to those close to him. The two were seen all over town, attending concerts, plays, and going to lunch and dinner together.  

They also began writing love letters to one another.  Well, Madison actually got someone else to write many letters for him.  He asked Dolley’s cousin, Catherine Coles, to write the letters on his behalf because the author of the Constitution and President Washington’s speech writer did not consider himself up to the task of writing a good love letter.  In one letter Coles wrote to Dolley, “he thinks so much of you in the day that he has Lost his Tongue, at Night he Dreames of you & Starts in his Sleep a Calling on you to relieve his Flame for he Burns to such an excess that he will be shortly consumed.”

While they were clearly in love, marriage raised other concerns.  In addition to the age difference, Dolley was a Quaker, James was Anglican.  If they got married, Dolley would be expelled from her meeting.  She would also likely have to give up living in the city for more time on Madison’s plantation back in Virginia.  She would also have to get used to the idea of owning slaves.

Dolley spent some time researching her suitor, reaching out to some of his friends to get their candid views about him.  One of them was the attorney who helped her get her estate, William Wilkins, who happened also to be a good friend of Madison’s.

Support for the marriage also came from another source.  During the summer of 1794, Dolley received an invitation to the Presidential Mansion.  Martha Washington assured Dolley that Madison, who had been a close friend of her husband’s for years, would make a wonderful husband.

Dolley opted to leave town for a while to get some perspective. She went to visit relatives in Virginia.  Madison recalled that years earlier, his fiancé, Kitty Floyd had done the same thing, and never came back. She ended up marrying someone else in New York that summer.  So Madison had to wonder, would history repeat itself?  Madison kept up a steady stream of love letters, most of which were still ghost written by Coles.

In one of the letters that he wrote himself, Madison asked Dolley to marry him.  He spent several weeks awaiting the reply. When it finally came, the answer was yes. The two married on September 15, 1794 on Dolley’s sister’s plantation near what is today Charlestown West Virginia.

The honeymoon was probably not much of one.  For starters, Dolley’s two sisters, Anna and Lucy accompanied them.  They visited friends and relatives, but the trip was cut short when Dolley became ill with the flu. They then had to return to Philadelphia when Madison had to be back in Congress.  As expected, Dolley was forced to leave her Quaker Meeting.

Madison moved out of his boarding house and rented a house on Spruce Street, recently occupied by James Monroe.  Madison’s old friend and rival had been appointed to replace Gouverneur Morris as Ambassador to France, and had left Philadelphia.  Dolley’s youngest sister Anna, age 14, also moved in with them.  Her two year old son Payne also rejoined the household after returning from Lucy’s Virginia plantation, where he stayed during the honeymoon trip.

Monroe, when he arrived in France, was happy to help purchase French furniture, carpets, and china for the Madisons.  The Madisons also began attending more social gatherings in Philadelphia.  Even John Adams, who rarely had anything good to say about anyone, wrote to his wife that “Mrs. Madison is a fine woman.”

Madison seemed to adapt happily to his new life as a husband and father. He would later tell friends that his marriage to Dolley was the most fortunate event of his life.

Next week: Congress decides it is finally time for the government to have a navy

 - - -

Next Episode 384 Rebirth of the US Navy (coming soon)

Previous Episode 382 Yellow Fever and Genêt Downfall

 Contact me via email at mtroy.history@gmail.com

 Follow the podcast on X (formerly Twitter) @AmRevPodcast

 Join the Facebook group, American Revolution Podcast 

 Join American Revolution Podcast on Quora 
 
Discuss the AmRev Podcast on Reddit

American Revolution Podcast Merch!

T-shirts, hoodies, mugs, pillows, totes, notebooks, wall art, and more.  Get your favorite American Revolution logo today.  Help support this podcast.  https://merch.amrevpodcast.com


American Revolution Podcast is distributed 100% free of charge. If you can chip in to help defray my costs, I'd appreciate whatever you can give.  Make a one time donation through my PayPal account. You may also donate via Venmo (@Michael-Troy-20).


Click here to see my Patreon Page
You can support the American Revolution Podcast as a Patreon subscriber.  This is an option making monthly pledges.  Patreon support will give you access to ad-free episodes, podcast extras, and help make the podcast a sustainable project.

An alternative to Patreon is SubscribeStar.  For anyone who has problems with Patreon, you can get the same benefits by subscribing at SubscribeStar.

Signup for the AmRev Podcast Mail List

* indicates required

Further Reading

Websites

“Correspondence of Eli Whitney Relative to the Invention of the Cotton Gin.” The American Historical Review, vol. 3, no. 1, 1897, pp. 90–127. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1832812

Federico, P. J. “Records of Eli Whitney’s Cotton Gin Patent.” Technology and Culture 1, no. 2 (1960): 168–76. https://doi.org/10.2307/3101059

Woodbury, Robert S. “The Legend of Eli Whitney and Interchangeable Parts.” Technology and Culture, vol. 1, no. 3, 1960, pp. 235–53. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3101392

Nathanael Greene https://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/history-archaeology/nathanael-greene-1742-1786

A Madison love affair https://www.breezejmu.org/life/a-madison-love-affair/article_dd5d4b4c-37d7-11e0-88d3-00127992bc8b.html

“Catharine Coles to Dolley Payne Todd, 1 June 1794,” Founders Online, National Archives, https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01-15-02-0249

Free eBooks
(from archive.org unless noted)

Brant, Irving James Madison: Father of the Constitution, 1787-1800. Bobbs-Merrill Co. 1950 (borrow only). 

Ely Whitney” Young Folks Library of Choice Literature, March 1, 1896. 

Olmsted, Denison Memoir of Eli Whitney, Esq. New Haven: Durrie & Peck 1848. 

Perry, Francis M. Four American Inventors, New York: Werner School Book Co. 1901. Brant, Irving James Madison: Father of the Constitution, 1787-1800. Bobbs-Merrill Co. 1950 (borrow only). 

Books Worth Buying
(links to Amazon.com unless otherwise noted)*

Allgor, Catherine A Perfect Union: Dolley Madison and the Creation of the American Nation, Henry Holt & Co. 2006. 

Chadwick, Bruce James and Dolley Madison: America’s First Power Couple, Prometheus Books, 2014. 

Chernow, Ron Washington, A Life, Penguin Press, 2010. 

Chervinsky, Lindsay M. The Cabinet: George Washington and the Creation of an American Institution, Belknap Press, 2020. 

Cote, Richard N. Strength And Honor: The Life Of Dolley Madison, Corinthian Books, 2004 (borrow on archive.org). 

Green, Constance Eli Whitney and the Birth of American Technology, Little Brown & Co. 1956. 

Elkins, Stanley M. and Eric McKitrick, The Age of Federalism: The Early American Republic, 1788–1800, Oxford Univ. Press, 1993 (borrow on archive.org). 

Lakwete, Angela Inventing the Cotton Gin: Machine and Myth in Antebellum America, Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 2003. 

McCullough, David John Adams, Simon & Schuster, 2001. 

McDonald, Forrest, The Presidency of George WashingtonUniv of Kansas Press, 1974.

Meacham, Jon Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power, Random House, 2012.

Miller, John C. Alexander Hamilton and the Growth of the New Nation, Routledge, 2017.

Mirskey, Jeannette and Allan Nevins The World of Eli Whitney, Collier Books, 1952. 

Patchett, Kaye Eli Whitney: Cotton Gin Genius, Black Birch Press, 2004 (borrow on archive.org). 

Thane, Elswyth Dolley Madison, her Life and Times, Crowell-Collier Press, 1970 (borrow on archive.org). 

Unger, Harlow G. "Mr. President": George Washington and the Making of the Nation's Highest Office, Da Capo Press, 2013.

* As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Sunday, April 5, 2026

AR-SP48 America Victorious, with Tom Hand

Our March 2026 American Revolution Round Table invited as our special guest author  Tom Hand.  We discussed his book America Victorious Lesser-Known Campaigns and Commanders That Helped Win American Independence, which focuses on the lesser-known commanders and campaigns of the American Revolution where George Washington was not physically present. Hand’s work aims to broaden the historical perspective of the war by highlighting individuals who made significant contributions that are often overshadowed by the "main players" like Washington, Franklin, and Adams.  These perspectives were covered in his first book, An American Triumph. 

The Northern Theater and the Duality of Benedict Arnold

A major portion of the discussion centers on the early years of the war in the North, specifically the role of Benedict Arnold before his infamous betrayal. Hand argues that if one had to pick an "indispensable man" for the first two years of the war in the northern theater, it would be Arnold. Before his name became synonymous with treason, Arnold was arguably the most successful battlefield commander in the American Revolution.

The conversation details the Quebec campaign, which, despite being a failure in its goal to bring Quebec into the Union, is described as an "incredible human endurance march". Arnold led his men through the Maine wilderness in a brutal trek where they were forced to eat their dogs and shoes to survive. Following the failed siege of Quebec, Arnold commanded the rear guard during the retreat back to American lines, culminating in the Battle of Valcour Island in October 1776.

Hand describes Valcour Island as the "naval Bunker Hill". While it was a tactical defeat, it was strategically one of the most important events of the war. Arnold’s "cobbled-together flotilla" delayed the British fleet under General Carlton for so long—until October 9th—that the British lost their entire 1776 campaign season. By forcing the British to wait until the following year to resume their push south toward Albany, Arnold prevented the colonies from being split early in the war.

The discussion also highlights Arnold’s "single-handed" success at Fort Stanwix, where he used a spy to spread rumors of a massive approaching army, effectively spooking British forces and their Native American allies into retreating. This action deprived General Burgoyne of essential reinforcements before the Battle of Saratoga. Regarding the Saratoga campaign, Hand asserts that Arnold likely disobeyed the spirit of General Horatio Gates’s orders to engage the field, though his aggressive leadership ultimately secured the victory.

The "Forgotten Men" of the North: Schuyler and Morgan

While Arnold and Gates often take the spotlight for Saratoga, Hand emphasizes the critical role of Philip Schuyler. Schuyler practiced a "scorched earth policy" that significantly delayed Burgoyne’s advance through the wilderness. By felling trees, tearing up roads, and diverting rivers to create swamps, Schuyler made every mile of the British march "miserable". These delays exhausted the British provisions and forced them into a desperate situation, laying the groundwork for the eventual American success.

The speakers also examine Daniel Morgan, a "tough frontiersman" who had famously survived 499 lashes from the British army as a teenager. Morgan is credited with the tactical masterpiece at Cowpens, where he utilized a "double envelopment" maneuver. This involved setting his militia in the front lines with orders to fire only a few shots and then "peel off," drawing the British into the steadfast Continentals in the third line. Hand notes that Morgan was a battlefield leader similar to Arnold in his aggressive style, but he remained loyal to the cause despite his own frustrations with Congress regarding promotions.

The Southern Campaign and Nathaniel Greene

Moving to the South, the discussion focuses on Nathaniel Greene, whom Hand calls a "poster child for perseverance". Greene’s strategy followed Washington’s philosophy: the most important objective was not winning specific battles, but keeping the army intact and in the field.

Greene actually lost most of his major battles—including Guilford Courthouse, Hobkirk's Hill, and Eutaw Springs—and failed to raise the siege at Ninety Six. However, his ability to "rise and move on again" after every defeat wore down General Cornwallis. Cornwallis eventually abandoned the Carolinas not because of a battlefield loss, but because he was "tired of chasing him all over the countryside". Hand highlights how Greene adapted Morgan’s Cowpens tactics at Guilford Courthouse, setting up three echelons of troops, though the different terrain meant the result was not a definitive victory like Cowpens. Despite the tactical loss, it was a "pyrrhic victory" for the British that cost Cornwallis dearly and forced his retreat.

George Rogers Clark and the Western Frontier

Hand sheds light on the often-overlooked Western theater, led by George Rogers Clark. At only 23 or 24 years old, Clark raised a small force of 170-180 "stouthearted Virginians" to capture British forts across the Ohio River in what was then considered part of Quebec.

Clark’s capture of Kaskaskia and Vincennes secured the Northwest Territory (modern-day Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois) for the United States. Hand claims this was one of the largest land acquisitions by conquest in American history. The conflict in the West was particularly brutal, described as a "continual" war involving bloody Native American attacks encouraged and armed by the British. These Kentucky settlers faced a higher mortality rate—70 men per thousand—compared to a maximum of 10 per thousand in other colonies.

Spain: The Forgotten Ally

A significant portion of the book and discussion is dedicated to Spain’s role in the revolution. Hand argues that Spain strategically deserves as much, if not more, credit than France. Because Spain was the world’s largest colonial empire, King Carlos III could not openly support a colonial rebellion against another monarch, as it might inspire his own colonies to revolt. Consequently, Spain never formed a formal alliance with the U.S. and fought the British as an independent power.

Spain’s contributions were twofold:

  1. Logistical Support: Merchants like Oliver Pollock in New Orleans used their own fortunes to supply and equip the American army in the West.
  2. Military Diversion: Under Governor Bernardo de Gálvez, Spanish forces captured British bases in the Mississippi Valley, Mobile, and Pensacola.

By driving the British out of West Florida, Spain prevented thousands of British troops from engaging the Americans. Furthermore, at the Treaty of Paris in 1783, the American claim to the Northwest Territory and Florida was supported by the principle of uti possidetis ("as you possess, so you shall possess"). Hand posits that if Spain had not conquered Florida, the British would likely have remained on America’s southern flank, which would have drastically altered the nation's future expansion and access to the Gulf of Mexico.

Leadership and the Legacy of George Washington

Throughout the discussion, George Washington is reaffirmed as the "indispensable man". Despite early military mistakes—such as staying too long in New York or nearly losing his army at Brandywine—Washington’s greatest legacy was his commitment to the civilian command of the military. He demonstrated immense patience in dealing with a difficult Congress and maintained control over an officer corps that frequently included "scoundrels" and rivals like Horatio Gates who sought to undermine him.

Washington is also praised for his ability to identify talent and give commanders second chances. For instance, after Nathaniel Greene "screwed up" the defense of Fort Washington, Washington did not give up on him, eventually trusting him with the critical Southern campaign.

The Tragedy of Benedict Arnold

The conversation concludes by reflecting on the profound nature of Benedict Arnold’s betrayal. Hand notes that the reason Arnold remains the ultimate traitor in American history is that "the fall was so great". He was the top fighter, second only to Washington in importance during the early war. His decision to not only switch sides but to attempt to surrender an entire army of men who were loyal to him is described as "hard to forgive". Hand draws a historical comparison to General George Patton going over to the Germans in 1944 to illustrate the magnitude of the shock Arnold’s actions caused the nation.

* * *

Please visit AmericanaCorner.com where you can learn more about Tom Hand and order his books.  You can order an autographed copy of America Victorious, and get a 15% discount with the promo code REVOLUTION.

His book is also available on Amazon.

To see upcoming roundtable events, or listen to past recordings, go to AmRevRT.org

To participate live in future Zoom events, be sure to join as a member on Patreon, or sign up for my mailing list,


Click here to see my Patreon Page
You can support the American Revolution Podcast as a Patreon subscriber.  This is an option making monthly pledges.  Patreon support will give you access to Podcast extras and help make the podcast a sustainable project.


Signup for the AmRev Podcast Mail List

* indicates required